<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Antibody study suggests coronavirus is far more widespread than previously thought</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31643095/antibody-study-suggests-coronavirus-is-far-more-widespread-than-previously-thought</link><description>A new study in California has found the number of people infected with coronavirus may be tens of times higher than previously thought.The study from Stanford University, which was released Friday and has yet to be peer reviewed, tested samples from</description><item><title>lots of antibodies kicking around in our bidies.hope they have an accurate test.maybe the antibodies we already have protect us from corona, and folk that lack them fall prey to it.some folk were immune to aids because of resistance built up to plagu</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31643095/antibody-study-suggests-coronavirus-is-far-more-widespread-than-previously-thought?post_id=559195517#559195517</link><description>lots of antibodies kicking around in our bidies.hope they have an accurate test.maybe the antibodies we already have protect us from corona, and folk that lack them fall prey to it.some folk were immune to aids because of resistance built up to plagu</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 15:07:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>tobermory, there is an article in the Sunday Times (full copy already poste don the politics forum) that will provide a hell of a lot of material for the forum and the media tomorrow.It does not paint a pretty picture for the government and for Johns</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31643095/antibody-study-suggests-coronavirus-is-far-more-widespread-than-previously-thought?post_id=559195307#559195307</link><description>tobermory, there is an article in the Sunday Times (full copy already poste don the politics forum) that will provide a hell of a lot of material for the forum and the media tomorrow.It does not paint a pretty picture for the government and for Johns</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 14:44:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The US and German studies plus Bergamo data are more consistent when you factor in demographics. Santa Clara has only 13.5% over 65, Gangelt has 19% over 65, Bergamo has 25% over 65.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31643095/antibody-study-suggests-coronavirus-is-far-more-widespread-than-previously-thought?post_id=559195301#559195301</link><description>The US and German studies plus Bergamo data are more consistent when you factor in demographics. Santa Clara has only 13.5% over 65, Gangelt has 19% over 65, Bergamo has 25% over 65.</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 14:44:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It is possible we do have 20 million imo. No one knows how infectious it is or when it started.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31643095/antibody-study-suggests-coronavirus-is-far-more-widespread-than-previously-thought?post_id=559195237#559195237</link><description>It is possible we do have 20 million imo. No one knows how infectious it is or when it started.</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 14:35:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Over 40% of tests in NY were +ve and they've done 600k tests.  Quite possibly people have been tested twice (negative first time, positive second time).  Both the number of cases and the +ve rate suggest the infection rate is higher there than anywhe</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31643095/antibody-study-suggests-coronavirus-is-far-more-widespread-than-previously-thought?post_id=559195219#559195219</link><description>Over 40% of tests in NY were +ve and they've done 600k tests.  Quite possibly people have been tested twice (negative first time, positive second time).  Both the number of cases and the +ve rate suggest the infection rate is higher there than anywhe</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 14:32:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>New York is currently 0.09% and rising</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31643095/antibody-study-suggests-coronavirus-is-far-more-widespread-than-previously-thought?post_id=559195179#559195179</link><description>New York is currently 0.09% and rising</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 14:27:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>you gotta suspect that these antibody tests and probably a lot of the testing in South Korea/Germany is giving off false positives...probably picking up milder varients of flu and coming back as positive for KungFLu...it would explain a lot of the va</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31643095/antibody-study-suggests-coronavirus-is-far-more-widespread-than-previously-thought?post_id=559194853#559194853</link><description>you gotta suspect that these antibody tests and probably a lot of the testing in South Korea/Germany is giving off false positives...probably picking up milder varients of flu and coming back as positive for KungFLu...it would explain a lot of the va</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 13:47:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>A Californian prick test, no thanks............</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31643095/antibody-study-suggests-coronavirus-is-far-more-widespread-than-previously-thought?post_id=559194829#559194829</link><description>A Californian prick test, no thanks............</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 13:45:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>In some places Eric (Bergamo for instance) 0.12% would mean more than everyone has been infected, therefore I agree it is flawed.  It's a question of how flawed.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31643095/antibody-study-suggests-coronavirus-is-far-more-widespread-than-previously-thought?post_id=559194785#559194785</link><description>In some places Eric (Bergamo for instance) 0.12% would mean more than everyone has been infected, therefore I agree it is flawed.  It's a question of how flawed.</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 13:37:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Clyde the "far more people have been infected than they'd thought" seemed to be shown in a similar study in Germany a couple weeks ago.https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/covid-antibody-test-in-german-town-shows-15-per-cent-infection-rate-0-4pc-death</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31643095/antibody-study-suggests-coronavirus-is-far-more-widespread-than-previously-thought?post_id=559194709#559194709</link><description>Clyde the "far more people have been infected than they'd thought" seemed to be shown in a similar study in Germany a couple weeks ago.https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/covid-antibody-test-in-german-town-shows-15-per-cent-infection-rate-0-4pc-death</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2020 13:26:50 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
