<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Metres</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31443901/metres</link><description>This on the back of an NHS ambulancehttp://i68.tinypic.com/n2o2ma.jpg</description><item><title>For very many years it was acceptable to use imperial for outline approval of planning submissions.Detail submissions have to be in metric, but I've been out of it for a long time, so without checking I'm not sure this is still the case!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31443901/metres?post_id=555443527#555443527</link><description>For very many years it was acceptable to use imperial for outline approval of planning submissions.Detail submissions have to be in metric, but I've been out of it for a long time, so without checking I'm not sure this is still the case!</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 07:15:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>pi is a bit of a bummer in metric or imperialamazing that folk have coped ....</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31443901/metres?post_id=555443507#555443507</link><description>pi is a bit of a bummer in metric or imperialamazing that folk have coped ....</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 07:11:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It's easy to read a 64th or 8th or 32nd on a tape or ruler, no matter how high you go, for example measuring over 300 inches it's still as easy as measuring little numbers. You look for the big number and then the fraction, you don't need 4 or 5 digi</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31443901/metres?post_id=555443487#555443487</link><description>It's easy to read a 64th or 8th or 32nd on a tape or ruler, no matter how high you go, for example measuring over 300 inches it's still as easy as measuring little numbers. You look for the big number and then the fraction, you don't need 4 or 5 digi</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 07:09:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>THey aren't just units of measurent, they work on different systems. Metric is entirely logical and linear, imperial is broken up into stupid ****ing arbitrary sub measurements where it might be 1/16ths here, 1/12ths there, 1/20 here, 1/4 there, diff</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31443901/metres?post_id=555443271#555443271</link><description>THey aren't just units of measurent, they work on different systems. Metric is entirely logical and linear, imperial is broken up into stupid ****ing arbitrary sub measurements where it might be 1/16ths here, 1/12ths there, 1/20 here, 1/4 there, diff</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:49:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Not sure metric is superior in engineering. Everyone has their own preference but I would rather be measuring to 60 1/4" than 1733mm. Some places work to all imperial drawings and some all metric, some both, I can't see how either could be superior t</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31443901/metres?post_id=555443133#555443133</link><description>Not sure metric is superior in engineering. Everyone has their own preference but I would rather be measuring to 60 1/4" than 1733mm. Some places work to all imperial drawings and some all metric, some both, I can't see how either could be superior t</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:33:18 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>in 110m hurdles the hurdles are 3 ft 6 high or 42 inches</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31443901/metres?post_id=555443041#555443041</link><description>in 110m hurdles the hurdles are 3 ft 6 high or 42 inches</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:19:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>For science and engeering, metric is far superior but saying a man is 183 cm hardly has the same ring as "6 ft".On the plus side using cm makes my whang sound bigger so .. swings and roundabouts</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31443901/metres?post_id=555442999#555442999</link><description>For science and engeering, metric is far superior but saying a man is 183 cm hardly has the same ring as "6 ft".On the plus side using cm makes my whang sound bigger so .. swings and roundabouts</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 06:12:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>All interesting stuff...."In 1983, Air Canada flight 143 from Montreal to Edmonton ran out of fuel midway through its flight because the amount of fuel had been calculated in pounds instead of kilograms. It glided to an emergency landing in Gimli, Ma</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31443901/metres?post_id=555442049#555442049</link><description>All interesting stuff...."In 1983, Air Canada flight 143 from Montreal to Edmonton ran out of fuel midway through its flight because the amount of fuel had been calculated in pounds instead of kilograms. It glided to an emergency landing in Gimli, Ma</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 02:34:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>"By the late 1970s all British examination boards were requiring knowledge of the metric system, but even today most 18-24 year-olds still do not know how much they weigh in kilograms (60%) or how tall they are in metres and centimetres (54%)".</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31443901/metres?post_id=555442039#555442039</link><description>"By the late 1970s all British examination boards were requiring knowledge of the metric system, but even today most 18-24 year-olds still do not know how much they weigh in kilograms (60%) or how tall they are in metres and centimetres (54%)".</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 02:31:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>NASA lost a $125 million Mars orbiter, because a Lockheed Martin engineering team used English units of measurement, while the agency's team used the more conventional metric system for a key spacecraft operation, according to a review finding.....</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/31443901/metres?post_id=555442031#555442031</link><description>NASA lost a $125 million Mars orbiter, because a Lockheed Martin engineering team used English units of measurement, while the agency's team used the more conventional metric system for a key spacecraft operation, according to a review finding.....</description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2018 02:28:29 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
