<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Algebra question</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30993909/algebra-question</link><description>X = 120 - R * (S - (V/(D/8))) + ((R/5) * (L - K)) + (U-126)/2V = ?i.e. Reorganize the formula</description><item><title>I reckon the numbers work better with the mathematic decisions. You can also use excel with the numbers, if you move the terms and check at each stage.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30993909/algebra-question?post_id=553670147#553670147</link><description>I reckon the numbers work better with the mathematic decisions. You can also use excel with the numbers, if you move the terms and check at each stage.</description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 12:39:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Or give them meaningful names, not just a random letter?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30993909/algebra-question?post_id=553669917#553669917</link><description>Or give them meaningful names, not just a random letter?</description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 12:07:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I did resolve this myself btw. I reckon it's easiest, if you put all numbers in place of letters &amp; then reorganise the equation.I reckon you make much less mistakes moving numbers around, rather than letters, since you consider what you are doing in</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30993909/algebra-question?post_id=553667579#553667579</link><description>I did resolve this myself btw. I reckon it's easiest, if you put all numbers in place of letters &amp; then reorganise the equation.I reckon you make much less mistakes moving numbers around, rather than letters, since you consider what you are doing in</description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 04:41:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I see Brassie has finally arrived.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30993909/algebra-question?post_id=553654383#553654383</link><description>I see Brassie has finally arrived.</description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 02:20:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30993909/algebra-question?post_id=553653757#553653757</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 17:29:45 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>R = 5.5S = 100.7V = 58.1D = 5L = 0K = 30U = 126X = 107Original formula had one minor error ,so the formulas are not going to work. The equation should be :-X=120-R*(S-(V/(D/8)))+((R/5)*L)-K+(U-126)/2X=120-ROUND(R7*(S7-(V7/(D7/8)))+((R7/5)*L7)-K7,0)+(</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30993909/algebra-question?post_id=553653711#553653711</link><description>R = 5.5S = 100.7V = 58.1D = 5L = 0K = 30U = 126X = 107Original formula had one minor error ,so the formulas are not going to work. The equation should be :-X=120-R*(S-(V/(D/8)))+((R/5)*L)-K+(U-126)/2X=120-ROUND(R7*(S7-(V7/(D7/8)))+((R7/5)*L7)-K7,0)+(</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 17:20:08 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>(The reason I estimated standard times to 10-0 on the Flat was in order to overlap with the weights carried in amateur riders' races; otherwise I found that the amateurs' races always ended up with the fastest relative time on the card; I know that t</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30993909/algebra-question?post_id=553653707#553653707</link><description>(The reason I estimated standard times to 10-0 on the Flat was in order to overlap with the weights carried in amateur riders' races; otherwise I found that the amateurs' races always ended up with the fastest relative time on the card; I know that t</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 17:19:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I've always used 10-0 on the Flat and 12-0 over jumps as a basis for estimating standard times. Perhaps I might have guessed what you were up to had the number been 140 or 168 instead of 126. Well, I wouldn't have, to be honest. When I did keep speed</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30993909/algebra-question?post_id=553653675#553653675</link><description>I've always used 10-0 on the Flat and 12-0 over jumps as a basis for estimating standard times. Perhaps I might have guessed what you were up to had the number been 140 or 168 instead of 126. Well, I wouldn't have, to be honest. When I did keep speed</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 17:05:01 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I can't be fussed doing it but yes plug in some numbers and see if the result is correct both ways. Obviously my answer could be improved, even if correct, to be a little neater! (no double - etc).</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30993909/algebra-question?post_id=553651587#553651587</link><description>I can't be fussed doing it but yes plug in some numbers and see if the result is correct both ways. Obviously my answer could be improved, even if correct, to be a little neater! (no double - etc).</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 12:41:07 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Thanks very much to JC &amp; sfb. I'll shove the numbers in &amp; check either tonight or tomorrow &amp; report back.I'd have thought some would recognize the equation format as a horse speed ratings calculation. The 126 is 9 stone in pounds and the 8 is the 8 f</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30993909/algebra-question?post_id=553648827#553648827</link><description>Thanks very much to JC &amp; sfb. I'll shove the numbers in &amp; check either tonight or tomorrow &amp; report back.I'd have thought some would recognize the equation format as a horse speed ratings calculation. The 126 is 9 stone in pounds and the 8 is the 8 f</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 01:55:58 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
