New Posts For Thread: Leaders of Britain First charged with causing religiously aggravated harassmenthttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30948525/leaders-of-britain-first-charged-with-causing-religiously-aggravated-harassmentThe leaders of the far-right group Britain First have been charged with causing religiously aggravated harassment.Paul Golding, 35, and Jayda Fransen, 31, have been charged by Kent Police after allegedly distributing leaflets as four men stood trial: ) fair enough, they weren't charged anyway.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30948525/leaders-of-britain-first-charged-with-causing-religiously-aggravated-harassment?post_id=552851739#552851739: ) fair enough, they weren't charged anyway.Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:10:35 -0500You posted "Blackburn doesn't understand , it's not possible to be in contempt of court unless you are in court".I have posted the relevant passage from the Contempt of Court Act that explains exactly how you can be in contempt of court without beinghttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30948525/leaders-of-britain-first-charged-with-causing-religiously-aggravated-harassment?post_id=552851235#552851235You posted "Blackburn doesn't understand , it's not possible to be in contempt of court unless you are in court".I have posted the relevant passage from the Contempt of Court Act that explains exactly how you can be in contempt of court without beingThu, 21 Sep 2017 11:18:29 -0500How else can you decide if someone is in contempt of court?Especially if he is not in court.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30948525/leaders-of-britain-first-charged-with-causing-religiously-aggravated-harassment?post_id=552851223#552851223How else can you decide if someone is in contempt of court?Especially if he is not in court.Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:16:23 -0500You have to disrespect the court...yes but only if you are in court otherwise we could all be guilty.or you have to have to defy a court injunction , that means you are breaking the law. The court has to set up such an injunction before you can breakhttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30948525/leaders-of-britain-first-charged-with-causing-religiously-aggravated-harassment?post_id=552851185#552851185You have to disrespect the court...yes but only if you are in court otherwise we could all be guilty.or you have to have to defy a court injunction , that means you are breaking the law. The court has to set up such an injunction before you can breakThu, 21 Sep 2017 11:08:16 -0500that is just the point , there must be a law that has been broken, it is not enough to say we consider you to be in contempt of court. There is no such law in reality outside the court.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30948525/leaders-of-britain-first-charged-with-causing-religiously-aggravated-harassment?post_id=552851147#552851147that is just the point , there must be a law that has been broken, it is not enough to say we consider you to be in contempt of court. There is no such law in reality outside the court.Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:02:04 -0500You said I didn't understand. It appears that you still don't. Perhaps the Wiki description is simpler for you to understandUnder the Contempt of Court Act 1981 it is criminal contempt of court to publish anything which creates a real risk that thttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30948525/leaders-of-britain-first-charged-with-causing-religiously-aggravated-harassment?post_id=552850993#552850993You said I didn't understand. It appears that you still don't. Perhaps the Wiki description is simpler for you to understandUnder the Contempt of Court Act 1981 it is criminal contempt of court to publish anything which creates a real risk that tThu, 21 Sep 2017 10:43:58 -0500I knew that.My point was how is it possible to be in contempt of court if you are not in court?That is the important thing.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30948525/leaders-of-britain-first-charged-with-causing-religiously-aggravated-harassment?post_id=552850897#552850897I knew that.My point was how is it possible to be in contempt of court if you are not in court?That is the important thing.Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:27:51 -0500lfc Strict Liability Contempt under the Contempt of Court Act 1981The strict liability rule may render the publication a contempt regardless of any intent to interfere with the course of justice in the proceedings. Refer to The Law, earlier in this ghttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30948525/leaders-of-britain-first-charged-with-causing-religiously-aggravated-harassment?post_id=552849867#552849867lfc Strict Liability Contempt under the Contempt of Court Act 1981The strict liability rule may render the publication a contempt regardless of any intent to interfere with the course of justice in the proceedings. Refer to The Law, earlier in this gThu, 21 Sep 2017 07:11:07 -0500Of course that is what they are trying to stop, the usual suspects .https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30948525/leaders-of-britain-first-charged-with-causing-religiously-aggravated-harassment?post_id=552849233#552849233Of course that is what they are trying to stop, the usual suspects .Thu, 21 Sep 2017 03:36:59 -0500Is it contempt of court to film outside the court? No, it would be illegal to make filming outside the court contempt of court.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30948525/leaders-of-britain-first-charged-with-causing-religiously-aggravated-harassment?post_id=552849229#552849229Is it contempt of court to film outside the court? No, it would be illegal to make filming outside the court contempt of court.Thu, 21 Sep 2017 03:35:40 -0500