New Posts For Thread: Problems with EVILUTION ?https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30827929/problems-with-evilution1. Darwin expressed worry about LACK of intermediate fossils. 2. Animals appear fully formed in fossil records? no previous linking organisms? Bats, example. 3. Lack of a viable mechanism for producing high levels of complex and specified informationRAINBOWS . Remember ...https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30827929/problems-with-evilution?post_id=559441245#559441245RAINBOWS . Remember ...Thu, 11 Jun 2020 19:52:47 -0500If someone is born with SIX fingers on each hand......do we embrace it as a sign of evolution.....NO we troll the poor fella until he/she has to chop it off to fit in 'society'...Just think how good that guy couldve been on the old Joanna.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30827929/problems-with-evilution?post_id=551390937#551390937If someone is born with SIX fingers on each hand......do we embrace it as a sign of evolution.....NO we troll the poor fella until he/she has to chop it off to fit in 'society'...Just think how good that guy couldve been on the old Joanna.Sat, 11 Mar 2017 13:13:08 -0600i can live with the universe being any age. It's completely irrelevant. The bible does not set a date, an age of the universe. That's the fault of one American tribe in the deep south.That's why Dawkin's travels there to make that point. What the bibhttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30827929/problems-with-evilution?post_id=551390533#551390533i can live with the universe being any age. It's completely irrelevant. The bible does not set a date, an age of the universe. That's the fault of one American tribe in the deep south.That's why Dawkin's travels there to make that point. What the bibSat, 11 Mar 2017 12:09:32 -0600If you really want to know about paleobiology you can look it up. I doubt very much that you do.Why don't we just cut out the middleman and you post your cretinist refutation? That's what you really want to do, isn't it?https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30827929/problems-with-evilution?post_id=551387211#551387211If you really want to know about paleobiology you can look it up. I doubt very much that you do.Why don't we just cut out the middleman and you post your cretinist refutation? That's what you really want to do, isn't it?Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:50:23 -0600I was not prepared to read the initial cut & paste post as it is a total f@@ing mess.Is the Zorro theory that every star we observe is only 6000 years old? Or are these stars older.If they are only a few thousand years they must be nearer to Earth thhttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30827929/problems-with-evilution?post_id=551386591#551386591I was not prepared to read the initial cut & paste post as it is a total f@@ing mess.Is the Zorro theory that every star we observe is only 6000 years old? Or are these stars older.If they are only a few thousand years they must be nearer to Earth thSat, 11 Mar 2017 02:43:37 -0600how do they date life found at 4 billion years ago.... do you want to tell me? or is the line of crap too long? bluff statement.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30827929/problems-with-evilution?post_id=551385937#551385937how do they date life found at 4 billion years ago.... do you want to tell me? or is the line of crap too long? bluff statement.Fri, 10 Mar 2017 20:35:41 -0600i think you are cracking foinavon.You've got too much time on your hands, Zorro. You need to get a job, give you something constructive to do.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30827929/problems-with-evilution?post_id=551382647#551382647i think you are cracking foinavon.You've got too much time on your hands, Zorro. You need to get a job, give you something constructive to do.Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:14:11 -0600One of the arguments for 'chance' occurrence of life is that yes, the odds were long, but the time available for was billions of years. Sadly for the Neo-Darwinists signs of life have now been discovered from over 4 billion years ago. The oft-quotedhttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30827929/problems-with-evilution?post_id=551382395#551382395One of the arguments for 'chance' occurrence of life is that yes, the odds were long, but the time available for was billions of years. Sadly for the Neo-Darwinists signs of life have now been discovered from over 4 billion years ago. The oft-quotedFri, 10 Mar 2017 11:32:52 -0600i think you are cracking foinavon.did that one get to you.6000 years RECORDED HISTORY....matches up with the bible.year 5777 - jewish relious calendar.no writings past adam at 3915 bc. cave paintings yes, but no rainbows in cave paintings? why is thahttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30827929/problems-with-evilution?post_id=551382375#551382375i think you are cracking foinavon.did that one get to you.6000 years RECORDED HISTORY....matches up with the bible.year 5777 - jewish relious calendar.no writings past adam at 3915 bc. cave paintings yes, but no rainbows in cave paintings? why is thaFri, 10 Mar 2017 11:29:11 -0600The general public may think that the (Darwinian) science is settled but most people who take any time to consider it realise it's hokum, a fairy tale!https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30827929/problems-with-evilution?post_id=551382271#551382271The general public may think that the (Darwinian) science is settled but most people who take any time to consider it realise it's hokum, a fairy tale!Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:13:12 -0600