<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: The injunction upheld</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30693165/the-injunction-upheld</link><description>No idea who had the threesome, but if I did and came on here and said " The 3 some definitely does NOT involve  XXX XXXXX" and named the guy is that breaking the law ?</description><item><title>15 gay guys up one another, and the one on the front and the one on the  end are screaming their  heads off...............................form a circle form a circleI'll get me coat</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30693165/the-injunction-upheld?post_id=548747161#548747161</link><description>15 gay guys up one another, and the one on the front and the one on the  end are screaming their  heads off...............................form a circle form a circleI'll get me coat</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 13:59:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The injunction is supposed to protect the children.If they're so worried about the kids, why didn't they think before they behaved like alley cats?They shouldn't have been allowed to have kids in the first place considering how many partners they'd h</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30693165/the-injunction-upheld?post_id=548747073#548747073</link><description>The injunction is supposed to protect the children.If they're so worried about the kids, why didn't they think before they behaved like alley cats?They shouldn't have been allowed to have kids in the first place considering how many partners they'd h</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 13:49:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Looks like the sun will be going down a few more times before we find out. Will someone oblige me and furnish me with the name? The suspense is killing me.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30693165/the-injunction-upheld?post_id=548747049#548747049</link><description>Looks like the sun will be going down a few more times before we find out. Will someone oblige me and furnish me with the name? The suspense is killing me.</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 13:48:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>a gay threesome--revolting</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30693165/the-injunction-upheld?post_id=548746981#548746981</link><description>a gay threesome--revolting</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 13:41:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Just Follow the Yellow Brick Road.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30693165/the-injunction-upheld?post_id=548746961#548746961</link><description>Just Follow the Yellow Brick Road.</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 13:39:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Until I consult my lawyer, I dont think I can mention who it wasnt, and if thats the case, if its against the law to say who it wasnt, would I get arrested for saying it wasnt me ?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30693165/the-injunction-upheld?post_id=548742327#548742327</link><description>Until I consult my lawyer, I dont think I can mention who it wasnt, and if thats the case, if its against the law to say who it wasnt, would I get arrested for saying it wasnt me ?</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 06:28:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Who wasn't it?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30693165/the-injunction-upheld?post_id=548742277#548742277</link><description>Who wasn't it?</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 06:21:55 -0500</pubDate></item><item><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30693165/the-injunction-upheld?post_id=548742251#548742251</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 06:17:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>No idea who had the threesome, but if I did and came on here and said " The 3 some definitely does NOT involve  XXX XXXXX" and named the guy is that breaking the law ?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30693165/the-injunction-upheld?post_id=548741963#548741963</link><description>No idea who had the threesome, but if I did and came on here and said " The 3 some definitely does NOT involve  XXX XXXXX" and named the guy is that breaking the law ?</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 05:35:37 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
