New Posts For Thread: Michael Portillohttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30673453/michael-portilloWhat an outstanding documentary on the Easter rising. It says alot that he wipes the floor with current day professional TV presenters.His train journeys around Britain were outstanding tvyes that one is much more in depth and interestinghttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30673453/michael-portillo?post_id=548270967#548270967yes that one is much more in depth and interestingSat, 02 Apr 2016 09:40:19 -0500I thought this programme was far better http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b075vnhthttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30673453/michael-portillo?post_id=548269797#548269797I thought this programme was far better http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b075vnhtSat, 02 Apr 2016 08:16:39 -0500no must about it, faced with shooting unarmed innocent civillians i would think i good portion of soldiers would refuse, even if orders from british were to shoot them or 'take no prisoners'. perfectly valid scenario whitewashed by potillo and dunnethttps://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30673453/michael-portillo?post_id=548269703#548269703no must about it, faced with shooting unarmed innocent civillians i would think i good portion of soldiers would refuse, even if orders from british were to shoot them or 'take no prisoners'. perfectly valid scenario whitewashed by potillo and dunnetSat, 02 Apr 2016 08:10:40 -0500It ust have been because they did take prisoners.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30673453/michael-portillo?post_id=548269231#548269231It ust have been because they did take prisoners.Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:36:24 -0500just saw the rising programme. Did Portillo really think sending soldiers into battle to 'take no prisoners' was somehow ambiguous or some sort o British slip of tongue . I cant imagine a use of words that is more succinct in their meaning.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30673453/michael-portillo?post_id=548268843#548268843just saw the rising programme. Did Portillo really think sending soldiers into battle to 'take no prisoners' was somehow ambiguous or some sort o British slip of tongue . I cant imagine a use of words that is more succinct in their meaning.Sat, 02 Apr 2016 06:56:20 -0500Now what's all this tripe about Portillo?https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30673453/michael-portillo?post_id=548268237#548268237Now what's all this tripe about Portillo?Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:55:01 -0500I don't get involved in heated political debates. Neither do I.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30673453/michael-portillo?post_id=548268233#548268233I don't get involved in heated political debates. Neither do I.Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:54:20 -0500Unintentional exclamation mark there.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30673453/michael-portillo?post_id=548268217#548268217Unintentional exclamation mark there.Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:51:15 -0500"My apologies, Makybe Diva. I thought you were involving in a heated debate which saw you express your displeasure at Michael Portillo, Ann Widdecombe and Edwina Currie not being elevated to the upper house."That's ok! Evgeny It definitely wasn't me.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30673453/michael-portillo?post_id=548268201#548268201"My apologies, Makybe Diva. I thought you were involving in a heated debate which saw you express your displeasure at Michael Portillo, Ann Widdecombe and Edwina Currie not being elevated to the upper house."That's ok! Evgeny It definitely wasn't me.Sat, 02 Apr 2016 04:50:05 -0500Takes one to know one twonky.https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30673453/michael-portillo?post_id=548267875#548267875Takes one to know one twonky.Sat, 02 Apr 2016 03:48:39 -0500