<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Nuclear Subs not necessary? why pay 100 billion</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30589833/nuclear-subs-not-necessary-why-pay-100-billion</link><description>We can still keep a nuclear deterrent - land based firing solutions exist. Mounted on trucks or on MOD property. We have at most 40 missiles. USA has about 1600 when i last looked twenty years ago. We cannot fire ours unless we get the USA's permissi</description><item><title>If I wanted to "syphon" some money out of the tax pot I would pretend I had spent it on some nuclear weapons and say they were in some submarines that were located in a remote location in Scotland but spent most of their time underwater.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30589833/nuclear-subs-not-necessary-why-pay-100-billion?post_id=546296727#546296727</link><description>If I wanted to "syphon" some money out of the tax pot I would pretend I had spent it on some nuclear weapons and say they were in some submarines that were located in a remote location in Scotland but spent most of their time underwater.</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:35:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Trident - The Final Solution to All Problemshttp://bit.ly/1KwvP7p</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30589833/nuclear-subs-not-necessary-why-pay-100-billion?post_id=546296621#546296621</link><description>Trident - The Final Solution to All Problemshttp://bit.ly/1KwvP7p</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:17:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>We should look for something cheaper from Russia or China...perhaps?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30589833/nuclear-subs-not-necessary-why-pay-100-billion?post_id=546296559#546296559</link><description>We should look for something cheaper from Russia or China...perhaps?</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 19:06:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>incredible someone could believe we have an independent nuclear deterrent.     We can't fire it without American permission !</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30589833/nuclear-subs-not-necessary-why-pay-100-billion?post_id=546293419#546293419</link><description>incredible someone could believe we have an independent nuclear deterrent.     We can't fire it without American permission !</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:52:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Corbyn will be absorbed, can't win in a **** game - viva zapata.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30589833/nuclear-subs-not-necessary-why-pay-100-billion?post_id=546292273#546292273</link><description>Corbyn will be absorbed, can't win in a **** game - viva zapata.</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:48:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Thanks Jeremy.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30589833/nuclear-subs-not-necessary-why-pay-100-billion?post_id=546292151#546292151</link><description>Thanks Jeremy.</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:35:17 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>We can still keep a nuclear deterrent - land based firing solutions exist. Mounted on trucks or on MOD property. We have at most 40 missiles. USA has about 1600 when i last looked twenty years ago. We cannot fire ours unless we get the USA's permissi</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30589833/nuclear-subs-not-necessary-why-pay-100-billion?post_id=546292021#546292021</link><description>We can still keep a nuclear deterrent - land based firing solutions exist. Mounted on trucks or on MOD property. We have at most 40 missiles. USA has about 1600 when i last looked twenty years ago. We cannot fire ours unless we get the USA's permissi</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:17:56 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
