<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Gideon George Osbourne and inflation at 0.5% is...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30417575/gideon-george-osbourne-and-inflation-at-05-is</link><description>All down to government policy. Nothing to do with the fact that the price of petrol has been falling like a stone through water.</description><item><title>I agree inflation should be based on EII.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30417575/gideon-george-osbourne-and-inflation-at-05-is?post_id=543076559#543076559</link><description>I agree inflation should be based on EII.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:33:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>In fact, there should be an EII (essentials inflation index). The CPI takes in too many 'big ticket' items. EII would just be the sundries of day to day life. Don't hold your breath for any political party to introduce that though.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30417575/gideon-george-osbourne-and-inflation-at-05-is?post_id=543076493#543076493</link><description>In fact, there should be an EII (essentials inflation index). The CPI takes in too many 'big ticket' items. EII would just be the sundries of day to day life. Don't hold your breath for any political party to introduce that though.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:30:15 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>LFC, you are talking about indexed inflation (whichever measure), in which you specify a given point as 100 and measure everything from that point.Standard practice for almost all economists is to define a base date, and one year later as the measure</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30417575/gideon-george-osbourne-and-inflation-at-05-is?post_id=543076409#543076409</link><description>LFC, you are talking about indexed inflation (whichever measure), in which you specify a given point as 100 and measure everything from that point.Standard practice for almost all economists is to define a base date, and one year later as the measure</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:26:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>not really, my point was really that inflation is the increase in the price of goods and services at any given time. If after 12 months inflation is 12% it will still be 12% after 13 months if nothing else changes.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30417575/gideon-george-osbourne-and-inflation-at-05-is?post_id=543076335#543076335</link><description>not really, my point was really that inflation is the increase in the price of goods and services at any given time. If after 12 months inflation is 12% it will still be 12% after 13 months if nothing else changes.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:22:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>lfc1971If we say inflation for one year is 12% and peoples wages for that year have increased by 0%..ok inflation is 12%Then year 2 inflation does not increase and neither do wages..then inflation is not 0%....it is still 12% for that year, that is w</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30417575/gideon-george-osbourne-and-inflation-at-05-is?post_id=543076187#543076187</link><description>lfc1971If we say inflation for one year is 12% and peoples wages for that year have increased by 0%..ok inflation is 12%Then year 2 inflation does not increase and neither do wages..then inflation is not 0%....it is still 12% for that year, that is w</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:15:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>That is misleading.  You are getting your terms mixed up.Your point is that for the last few years there has been a decline in many people's standard of living defined by CPI/RPS (or any measure you care to use) vs wage increases.And for decades befo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30417575/gideon-george-osbourne-and-inflation-at-05-is?post_id=543076093#543076093</link><description>That is misleading.  You are getting your terms mixed up.Your point is that for the last few years there has been a decline in many people's standard of living defined by CPI/RPS (or any measure you care to use) vs wage increases.And for decades befo</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:09:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>here is the point, it is still 12% for that year, that is what you will have to pay.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30417575/gideon-george-osbourne-and-inflation-at-05-is?post_id=543075915#543075915</link><description>here is the point, it is still 12% for that year, that is what you will have to pay.</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:56:45 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>^^^^tut tut, dishonest quote!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30417575/gideon-george-osbourne-and-inflation-at-05-is?post_id=543075875#543075875</link><description>^^^^tut tut, dishonest quote!</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:54:05 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>dylan has it covered so as a negative number may not be great you can bet your bottom dollar gideon will be giving the train companys the heads up for another inflation busting rise next jan,because they wont want a large figure dropping off been rep</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30417575/gideon-george-osbourne-and-inflation-at-05-is?post_id=543075847#543075847</link><description>dylan has it covered so as a negative number may not be great you can bet your bottom dollar gideon will be giving the train companys the heads up for another inflation busting rise next jan,because they wont want a large figure dropping off been rep</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:52:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Then year 2 inflation does not increase and neither do wages..then inflation is not 0%....it is still 12% for that year</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30417575/gideon-george-osbourne-and-inflation-at-05-is?post_id=543075639#543075639</link><description>Then year 2 inflation does not increase and neither do wages..then inflation is not 0%....it is still 12% for that year</description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:41:35 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
