<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Witness credibility</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30409405/witness-credibility</link><description>I have just had a quick read through some paperwork relating to an ongoing case with a work colleague of mine. One witness in particular has stated that they had consumed a certain amount of alcohol which I was easily able to check within 2 mins to b</description><item><title>apologies crackajack - misread the opening message - so if its a woman its 28 units and a man is 42 units - that does change things somewhat I would agree</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30409405/witness-credibility?post_id=542841283#542841283</link><description>apologies crackajack - misread the opening message - so if its a woman its 28 units and a man is 42 units - that does change things somewhat I would agree</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 16:27:34 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Glad you appreciamated my convivial jollijestatude!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30409405/witness-credibility?post_id=542839925#542839925</link><description>Glad you appreciamated my convivial jollijestatude!</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:16:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Fair enough point c7. I don't know what CPS criteria is these days but % of a conviction isn't always their only priority.As for the taxpayer issue - taxpayers pay for everything and always have. As a taxpayer I feel better about supporting some thin</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30409405/witness-credibility?post_id=542839897#542839897</link><description>Fair enough point c7. I don't know what CPS criteria is these days but % of a conviction isn't always their only priority.As for the taxpayer issue - taxpayers pay for everything and always have. As a taxpayer I feel better about supporting some thin</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:15:31 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>his toenails which were causing pain. It is those who allow this to happen who should "foot the bill". Dr Slicer a cleverly worked pun.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30409405/witness-credibility?post_id=542839789#542839789</link><description>his toenails which were causing pain. It is those who allow this to happen who should "foot the bill". Dr Slicer a cleverly worked pun.</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:11:24 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Don't worry about the UK taxpayers.Abu Hamza was allowed not to go to a court hearing because he refused to allow a chiropodist deal with his toenails which were causing pain. It is those who allow this to happen who should foot the bill. The UK gove</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30409405/witness-credibility?post_id=542839683#542839683</link><description>Don't worry about the UK taxpayers.Abu Hamza was allowed not to go to a court hearing because he refused to allow a chiropodist deal with his toenails which were causing pain. It is those who allow this to happen who should foot the bill. The UK gove</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:08:24 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I suppose you're correct parachute. Im just interested in what other opinions are regarding decisions like this made by the CPS. Ultimately I believe this account may be dismissed as not credible. But that could be after a lengthy process which will</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30409405/witness-credibility?post_id=542839473#542839473</link><description>I suppose you're correct parachute. Im just interested in what other opinions are regarding decisions like this made by the CPS. Ultimately I believe this account may be dismissed as not credible. But that could be after a lengthy process which will</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:01:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>As you say crackajack7, probably best not to discuss somebody else's ongoing cases "anonymously" ....</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30409405/witness-credibility?post_id=542839061#542839061</link><description>As you say crackajack7, probably best not to discuss somebody else's ongoing cases "anonymously" ....</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:47:09 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>"For their gender" does not specify a female or male </title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30409405/witness-credibility?post_id=542838849#542838849</link><description>"For their gender" does not specify a female or male </description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:40:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Totally understand crackajack7. Can't think why the thought occurred to me..."for their gender"</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30409405/witness-credibility?post_id=542838595#542838595</link><description>Totally understand crackajack7. Can't think why the thought occurred to me..."for their gender"</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:33:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Parachute, Probably not wise of me to comment on any details of this case, As I'm sure you will appreciate.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30409405/witness-credibility?post_id=542838411#542838411</link><description>Parachute, Probably not wise of me to comment on any details of this case, As I'm sure you will appreciate.</description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:28:52 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
