<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: No Smoking in Trafalgar Square</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30366967/no-smoking-in-trafalgar-square</link><description>http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-29623851Smoking could be banned in Trafalgar and Parliament squares as well as the city's parks if a report by London's Health Commission is implemented.Other measures put forward include Oyster card discount</description><item><title>....but feeding the pigeons so they can carp on everyone is ok.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30366967/no-smoking-in-trafalgar-square?post_id=541881217#541881217</link><description>....but feeding the pigeons so they can carp on everyone is ok.</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:45:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>We are becoming too risk adverse in the West, because we have comfortable livesToo f*cking right. It's insidious, and it's making us miserable and paranoid.For the record, I don't smoke. Since the ban as it is now though, I have never been bothered (</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30366967/no-smoking-in-trafalgar-square?post_id=541881189#541881189</link><description>We are becoming too risk adverse in the West, because we have comfortable livesToo f*cking right. It's insidious, and it's making us miserable and paranoid.For the record, I don't smoke. Since the ban as it is now though, I have never been bothered (</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:43:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>We are becoming too risk adverse in the West, because we have comfortable livesbut it is no good them being comfortable if we make them more miserable for themselvesThe 1960/70's were a better and happier time, no one had trouble with smoking then</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30366967/no-smoking-in-trafalgar-square?post_id=541868395#541868395</link><description>We are becoming too risk adverse in the West, because we have comfortable livesbut it is no good them being comfortable if we make them more miserable for themselvesThe 1960/70's were a better and happier time, no one had trouble with smoking then</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:02:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It should still be personal choiceThere is nothing wrong with indoor smoking and non smoking areasand do people think by banning smoking people will live forever.....sadly noI hope this does not come as a shock to some peopleI don't think banning smo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30366967/no-smoking-in-trafalgar-square?post_id=541868371#541868371</link><description>It should still be personal choiceThere is nothing wrong with indoor smoking and non smoking areasand do people think by banning smoking people will live forever.....sadly noI hope this does not come as a shock to some peopleI don't think banning smo</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:00:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I thank you.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30366967/no-smoking-in-trafalgar-square?post_id=541868175#541868175</link><description>I thank you.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 07:44:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/secondhand_smoke/health_effects/</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30366967/no-smoking-in-trafalgar-square?post_id=541867885#541867885</link><description>http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/secondhand_smoke/health_effects/</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 07:12:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Clungehungry    15 Oct 14 13:02  Ahem, source please.The old ones are the best</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30366967/no-smoking-in-trafalgar-square?post_id=541867817#541867817</link><description>Clungehungry    15 Oct 14 13:02  Ahem, source please.The old ones are the best</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 07:07:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Where did that figure come from? Anti-smoking campaigners?A lot more than 2.5 million have died at war, from natural causes and winter 'flu. Stop breathing, be a hippie, and you could survive.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30366967/no-smoking-in-trafalgar-square?post_id=541867809#541867809</link><description>Where did that figure come from? Anti-smoking campaigners?A lot more than 2.5 million have died at war, from natural causes and winter 'flu. Stop breathing, be a hippie, and you could survive.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 07:06:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Ahem, source please.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30366967/no-smoking-in-trafalgar-square?post_id=541867773#541867773</link><description>Ahem, source please.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 07:02:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>no not 29, think the smoking ban was 2007That's good to hear but research does say different, in the last 50 years 2.5 million have died from second hand smoke</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30366967/no-smoking-in-trafalgar-square?post_id=541867747#541867747</link><description>no not 29, think the smoking ban was 2007That's good to hear but research does say different, in the last 50 years 2.5 million have died from second hand smoke</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 07:00:11 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
