<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Anyone with employment law/redundancy law knowledge?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30345259/anyone-with-employment-lawredundancy-law-knowledge</link><description>My role was made redundant last month. They were at pains to explain that it was the role being made redundant, not me.Today I have seen an advert for my job, including a mention of one aspect that they kept highlighting throughout the redundancy pro</description><item><title>Roger ,see a specialist,i studied employment law in the dim and distant past and as cmat suggests there was a 26wks rule and also there were rules for what happens if the employer backtracks on changes to the  nature of the job.Dont know what the cur</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30345259/anyone-with-employment-lawredundancy-law-knowledge?post_id=541385383#541385383</link><description>Roger ,see a specialist,i studied employment law in the dim and distant past and as cmat suggests there was a 26wks rule and also there were rules for what happens if the employer backtracks on changes to the  nature of the job.Dont know what the cur</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 03:43:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Butlers, two a penny imo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30345259/anyone-with-employment-lawredundancy-law-knowledge?post_id=541384865#541384865</link><description>Butlers, two a penny imo</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 01:56:02 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This is how it is when a country has a surplus of labour. There will be hundreds of applicants for the "new" post.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30345259/anyone-with-employment-lawredundancy-law-knowledge?post_id=541384831#541384831</link><description>This is how it is when a country has a surplus of labour. There will be hundreds of applicants for the "new" post.</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 01:50:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I wouldn't be surprised in the least if this was common practice by companies.Don't know the legalities, but I guess the new employee's contract can be compared to your old one, assuming both could be presented in claims court when he/she's hired, if</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30345259/anyone-with-employment-lawredundancy-law-knowledge?post_id=541379733#541379733</link><description>I wouldn't be surprised in the least if this was common practice by companies.Don't know the legalities, but I guess the new employee's contract can be compared to your old one, assuming both could be presented in claims court when he/she's hired, if</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 16:09:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Having engineered this for whatever reason they had I don't think I'd make the shortlist....</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30345259/anyone-with-employment-lawredundancy-law-knowledge?post_id=541379647#541379647</link><description>Having engineered this for whatever reason they had I don't think I'd make the shortlist....</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 16:04:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>re apply for the job.you have the experience and know the role inside out. They wouldn't even need to train you up.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30345259/anyone-with-employment-lawredundancy-law-knowledge?post_id=541379591#541379591</link><description>re apply for the job.you have the experience and know the role inside out. They wouldn't even need to train you up.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 16:01:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Cheers, will do.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30345259/anyone-with-employment-lawredundancy-law-knowledge?post_id=541379523#541379523</link><description>Cheers, will do.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:58:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>If memory serves, if they make you redundant they can't advertise your job for 26 weeks from the day you leave their employment. Check it out with an employment lawyer.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30345259/anyone-with-employment-lawredundancy-law-knowledge?post_id=541379417#541379417</link><description>If memory serves, if they make you redundant they can't advertise your job for 26 weeks from the day you leave their employment. Check it out with an employment lawyer.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:52:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Scandanavian Haven - exactly what it seems to be to me. But surely it isn't legal? Otherwise there would be no point in employment law and regulations, you could just make anyone redundant by saying the role was going, then start it up again the foll</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30345259/anyone-with-employment-lawredundancy-law-knowledge?post_id=541379371#541379371</link><description>Scandanavian Haven - exactly what it seems to be to me. But surely it isn't legal? Otherwise there would be no point in employment law and regulations, you could just make anyone redundant by saying the role was going, then start it up again the foll</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:49:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Didn't appeal against it but had someone in with me note taking, and have copies of all their official notes from the meetings. Both sets of notes state that one substantial section of the job was being removed to another company and wasn't needed, a</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30345259/anyone-with-employment-lawredundancy-law-knowledge?post_id=541379345#541379345</link><description>Didn't appeal against it but had someone in with me note taking, and have copies of all their official notes from the meetings. Both sets of notes state that one substantial section of the job was being removed to another company and wasn't needed, a</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:48:06 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
