<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: INFORMATION ON BINOCULARS</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30108421/information-on-binoculars</link><description>IVE GOT 8-42 WHATS THE NEXT STRONGEST PLEASE</description><item><title>I would just like to know EXACTLY  what all you four 'em ites want bins for!!??  In fact I am going to report this thread.  It will make yewtree look like a tiny weed when they collect you use lot!!!  NAP</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30108421/information-on-binoculars?post_id=535929507#535929507</link><description>I would just like to know EXACTLY  what all you four 'em ites want bins for!!??  In fact I am going to report this thread.  It will make yewtree look like a tiny weed when they collect you use lot!!!  NAP</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 08:19:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Also possible to get zoom binoculars to vary the magnification - I've got some 8-24 x 50 for example. I also have a monopod to keep them steady - I find it more convenient than carting a tripod around.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30108421/information-on-binoculars?post_id=535928645#535928645</link><description>Also possible to get zoom binoculars to vary the magnification - I've got some 8-24 x 50 for example. I also have a monopod to keep them steady - I find it more convenient than carting a tripod around.</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 07:23:31 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I've 2 pairs of 10 x 50's both are reasonable quality and both cost less than &Acirc;&pound;30. I've also a small telescope but I much prefer to use my bins as they are so portable.Celestron make a pair that cost around &Acirc;&pound;30. I can't vouch for them but Celestron</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30108421/information-on-binoculars?post_id=535927193#535927193</link><description>I've 2 pairs of 10 x 50's both are reasonable quality and both cost less than &Acirc;&pound;30. I've also a small telescope but I much prefer to use my bins as they are so portable.Celestron make a pair that cost around &Acirc;&pound;30. I can't vouch for them but Celestron</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 05:32:16 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Mine are 20x50 and are a pain in the arse to keep still on a windy day.What if you have both hands free to hold them</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30108421/information-on-binoculars?post_id=535923523#535923523</link><description>Mine are 20x50 and are a pain in the arse to keep still on a windy day.What if you have both hands free to hold them</description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:09:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Poppydog. 12 Oct 13 18:49   ANything above 10x, you'll need a steady arm or a tripod CorrectMine are 20x50 and are a pain in the arse to keep still on a windy day.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30108421/information-on-binoculars?post_id=535923419#535923419</link><description>Poppydog. 12 Oct 13 18:49   ANything above 10x, you'll need a steady arm or a tripod CorrectMine are 20x50 and are a pain in the arse to keep still on a windy day.</description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 18:54:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Don't waste money on expensive binoculars , simply stand closer to the object you wish to view .</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30108421/information-on-binoculars?post_id=535920341#535920341</link><description>Don't waste money on expensive binoculars , simply stand closer to the object you wish to view .</description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 15:29:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes. I'd agree with technology. The optics in the past few years are amazing.Look at something brought out only in the past few years. However testing some from &Acirc;&pound;20-&Acirc;&pound;350, I'd disregard anything under, say, &Acirc;&pound;60They were all no good, especially in t</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30108421/information-on-binoculars?post_id=535916603#535916603</link><description>Yes. I'd agree with technology. The optics in the past few years are amazing.Look at something brought out only in the past few years. However testing some from &Acirc;&pound;20-&Acirc;&pound;350, I'd disregard anything under, say, &Acirc;&pound;60They were all no good, especially in t</description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 13:21:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>In fairness Poppy, quality has come a long way and prices have dropped.That's why I asked what he needed them for.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30108421/information-on-binoculars?post_id=535916091#535916091</link><description>In fairness Poppy, quality has come a long way and prices have dropped.That's why I asked what he needed them for.</description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 13:00:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>*n10x42s the Vanguards</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30108421/information-on-binoculars?post_id=535915839#535915839</link><description>*n10x42s the Vanguards</description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:51:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>ANything above 10x, you'll need a steady arm or a tripodI bought a decent pair of Vanguards last month for a trip abroad and they are excellent.Way better than my previous PentaxBinoculars usually follow the well used phrase you get what you pay for</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/30108421/information-on-binoculars?post_id=535915789#535915789</link><description>ANything above 10x, you'll need a steady arm or a tripodI bought a decent pair of Vanguards last month for a trip abroad and they are excellent.Way better than my previous PentaxBinoculars usually follow the well used phrase you get what you pay for</description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 12:49:21 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
