<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Chilcot inquiry - tomorrow Blairs turn</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23457286/chilcot-inquiry---tomorrow-blairs-turn</link><description>Any else interested in this? Apparently he will face a 6 hour grilling on why he made the decisions he did. Got a huge amount to answer for IMO, on why he took us into an illegal war, using false reasons, thus costing the lives of hundreds of young B</description><item><title>You wanna be careful... . :|</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23457286/chilcot-inquiry---tomorrow-blairs-turn?post_id=418928438#418928438</link><description>You wanna be careful... . :|</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:21:05 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>tobermory - how the hell did you get wind of the Iraqi plans to annex Devon ?!?!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23457286/chilcot-inquiry---tomorrow-blairs-turn?post_id=418928430#418928430</link><description>tobermory - how the hell did you get wind of the Iraqi plans to annex Devon ?!?!</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:20:47 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>given that iraq only porduces about 5% at the most of the worlds oil supplies it would cost a lot more to invade etc than it will make from oil.. if anything iraq qas revenge on the part of g bush snr...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23457286/chilcot-inquiry---tomorrow-blairs-turn?post_id=418928426#418928426</link><description>given that iraq only porduces about 5% at the most of the worlds oil supplies it would cost a lot more to invade etc than it will make from oil.. if anything iraq qas revenge on the part of g bush snr...</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:19:31 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>what did Saddam have to do with terrorists though Gazo?Maybe if they had sent the armies to the place where the terrorists were instead of Iraq there wouldn't be so many of them on the loose.Iraq had no WMD , and even if they'd had some they had no</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23457286/chilcot-inquiry---tomorrow-blairs-turn?post_id=418928422#418928422</link><description>what did Saddam have to do with terrorists though Gazo?Maybe if they had sent the armies to the place where the terrorists were instead of Iraq there wouldn't be so many of them on the loose.Iraq had no WMD , and even if they'd had some they had no</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:19:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>C'mon GAZO, stop foaming at the mouth. :)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23457286/chilcot-inquiry---tomorrow-blairs-turn?post_id=418928398#418928398</link><description>C'mon GAZO, stop foaming at the mouth. :)</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:43:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>evingolis,its cowards like you that will destroy this country,i get the impression that you are one of those people who love it when a terroist bomb goes off in this country or one of our soldiers die because'' we got what we deserved'',i would say s</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23457286/chilcot-inquiry---tomorrow-blairs-turn?post_id=418928386#418928386</link><description>evingolis,its cowards like you that will destroy this country,i get the impression that you are one of those people who love it when a terroist bomb goes off in this country or one of our soldiers die because'' we got what we deserved'',i would say s</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:41:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Whatever the case, there was no legal case to be made for war.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23457286/chilcot-inquiry---tomorrow-blairs-turn?post_id=418928382#418928382</link><description>Whatever the case, there was no legal case to be made for war.</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:39:14 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>GAZO does still raise a serious point though : how do you deal with nations intent on obtaining nuclear technology for aggressive purposes ?My point is that in the case of Iraq there was no threat and the whole WMD bulls-hit was simply a pretext to i</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23457286/chilcot-inquiry---tomorrow-blairs-turn?post_id=418928374#418928374</link><description>GAZO does still raise a serious point though : how do you deal with nations intent on obtaining nuclear technology for aggressive purposes ?My point is that in the case of Iraq there was no threat and the whole WMD bulls-hit was simply a pretext to i</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:34:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>gazo- you are clueless. give it up.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23457286/chilcot-inquiry---tomorrow-blairs-turn?post_id=418928370#418928370</link><description>gazo- you are clueless. give it up.</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:27:48 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>If Israel did bomb Iran without concrete proof then it too should be brought to account, although I very much doubt it would. That's what pis-ses off so many other nations - the way that the US, UK and Israel can get away with breaking international</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23457286/chilcot-inquiry---tomorrow-blairs-turn?post_id=418928362#418928362</link><description>If Israel did bomb Iran without concrete proof then it too should be brought to account, although I very much doubt it would. That's what pis-ses off so many other nations - the way that the US, UK and Israel can get away with breaking international</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:22:41 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
