<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Calling Slartybartfast</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23446686/calling-slartybartfast</link><description>Slarty, I downloaded a dodgy copy of all of Sagan's works via torrents including that book you mentioned. I'm 1/3rd of the way through it and can confirm that Sagan indeed is an atheist. He puts his views far better and more convincing than Dawking c</description><item><title>I'm more comfortable with the agnostc label, personally. It seems to me that thinking that you don't, and possibly can't, know ultimate truth is a more logical position than stating for sure that there is no "God/gods" (whatever they are!?). But, lik</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23446686/calling-slartybartfast?post_id=418650658#418650658</link><description>I'm more comfortable with the agnostc label, personally. It seems to me that thinking that you don't, and possibly can't, know ultimate truth is a more logical position than stating for sure that there is no "God/gods" (whatever they are!?). But, lik</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:25:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>the prefix "a" has negative connotations. I prefer to refer to "theists" as suffreing from areason.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23446686/calling-slartybartfast?post_id=418650642#418650642</link><description>the prefix "a" has negative connotations. I prefer to refer to "theists" as suffreing from areason.</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:13:25 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The term atheist does what it says on the sin.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23446686/calling-slartybartfast?post_id=418650638#418650638</link><description>The term atheist does what it says on the sin.</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:11:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I could count myself in the agnostic camp as I ultimately don't know the answer but I'd rather call myself an atheist until I see the evidence for a higher being. You cannot sit on the fence and call yourself an agnostic, you either sway into one cam</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23446686/calling-slartybartfast?post_id=418650634#418650634</link><description>I could count myself in the agnostic camp as I ultimately don't know the answer but I'd rather call myself an atheist until I see the evidence for a higher being. You cannot sit on the fence and call yourself an agnostic, you either sway into one cam</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:10:19 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>huh?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23446686/calling-slartybartfast?post_id=418650630#418650630</link><description>huh?</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:09:48 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Sagan was an infidel. Hope this clears things up. ;)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23446686/calling-slartybartfast?post_id=418650626#418650626</link><description>Sagan was an infidel. Hope this clears things up. ;)</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:07:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>oh you non-believer :-)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23446686/calling-slartybartfast?post_id=418650622#418650622</link><description>oh you non-believer :-)</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:03:24 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I dislike the term atheist.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23446686/calling-slartybartfast?post_id=418650614#418650614</link><description>I dislike the term atheist.</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:02:06 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>cheers, ovalI'm sure I'll read it some time but at the moment I've not got the time. I'm not stuck on him being an agnostic rather than an atheist: there is evidence of both. I think the agnosticism may have been a late development. http://www.celeba</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23446686/calling-slartybartfast?post_id=418650606#418650606</link><description>cheers, ovalI'm sure I'll read it some time but at the moment I've not got the time. I'm not stuck on him being an agnostic rather than an atheist: there is evidence of both. I think the agnosticism may have been a late development. http://www.celeba</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 07:00:44 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Slarty, I downloaded a dodgy copy of all of Sagan's works via torrents including that book you mentioned. I'm 1/3rd of the way through it and can confirm that Sagan indeed is an atheist. He puts his views far better and more convincing than Dawking c</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23446686/calling-slartybartfast?post_id=418650538#418650538</link><description>Slarty, I downloaded a dodgy copy of all of Sagan's works via torrents including that book you mentioned. I'm 1/3rd of the way through it and can confirm that Sagan indeed is an atheist. He puts his views far better and more convincing than Dawking c</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 06:35:14 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
