<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Life on Mars?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23411306/life-on-mars</link><description>article in the times todaymust say that if correct is profound and arguably the greatest discovery ever made. personally i believe we are not alone in the universe, however the impact of discovering intelligent alien life would be impossible to predi</description><item><title>They could match stuff from comets, or from outside the solar system probably as well, bog.But I take the point.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23411306/life-on-mars?post_id=417336162#417336162</link><description>They could match stuff from comets, or from outside the solar system probably as well, bog.But I take the point.</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:59:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>If our scientists know exactly what went on 13,000 years ago on a world millions of years ago why can they not build an affordable car that doesn't require the use of petrol to run it and then do what they did in the 60's with the electric car in Ame</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23411306/life-on-mars?post_id=417336158#417336158</link><description>If our scientists know exactly what went on 13,000 years ago on a world millions of years ago why can they not build an affordable car that doesn't require the use of petrol to run it and then do what they did in the 60's with the electric car in Ame</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:58:24 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Gasses within the substances in the meteorite match with those found by Viking in the atmosphere, I read the other day. Also, the outer 4 planets are out for obvious reasons. The inner 2 are out because of gravity (Id assume).</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23411306/life-on-mars?post_id=417336154#417336154</link><description>Gasses within the substances in the meteorite match with those found by Viking in the atmosphere, I read the other day. Also, the outer 4 planets are out for obvious reasons. The inner 2 are out because of gravity (Id assume).</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:57:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>This is highly thought provoking on the subjecthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buqtdpuZxvk</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23411306/life-on-mars?post_id=417336134#417336134</link><description>This is highly thought provoking on the subjecthttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buqtdpuZxvk</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:28:58 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>What puzzle me is the assertion that Mars has metiorites which seem to break off and land on earth :0And our 'Scientists' know what they are and where they're from 13,000 (?) years later!And no-one questions it.The universe is more or less infinite.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23411306/life-on-mars?post_id=417336130#417336130</link><description>What puzzle me is the assertion that Mars has metiorites which seem to break off and land on earth :0And our 'Scientists' know what they are and where they're from 13,000 (?) years later!And no-one questions it.The universe is more or less infinite.</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:25:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>i liked the show</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23411306/life-on-mars?post_id=417336126#417336126</link><description>i liked the show</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:19:42 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I agree with flatliner on this one.The new Nasa budget is decided in January and they want a 20% increase.This part gives it away: However, he added that the study was not a </title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23411306/life-on-mars?post_id=417336122#417336122</link><description>I agree with flatliner on this one.The new Nasa budget is decided in January and they want a 20% increase.This part gives it away: However, he added that the study was not a </description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:49:45 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>actually its an update on the "old news" as they have addressed the questions of contamination etc previously associated with the original discovery</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23411306/life-on-mars?post_id=417336118#417336118</link><description>actually its an update on the "old news" as they have addressed the questions of contamination etc previously associated with the original discovery</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:47:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Old news, remember this from about 10(?) years ago, open to guesses, suggested that NASA said it was a fossil of life because their budgets were under pressure....</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23411306/life-on-mars?post_id=417336114#417336114</link><description>Old news, remember this from about 10(?) years ago, open to guesses, suggested that NASA said it was a fossil of life because their budgets were under pressure....</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:33:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Thats not the case at all. There is ice under the surface in Mars, and we haven't got a clue what is in it. There has been relevantly recent water movement there to, looking at the rock formations. It is an open question.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/chit_chat/go/thread/view/94038/23411306/life-on-mars?post_id=417336110#417336110</link><description>Thats not the case at all. There is ice under the surface in Mars, and we haven't got a clue what is in it. There has been relevantly recent water movement there to, looking at the rock formations. It is an open question.</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:05:12 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
