<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Walsh over Fences</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30460271/walsh-over-fences</link><description>"Gone at the game""No winner since 2009"MEH ! :)</description><item><title>Put it another way.After years three....four....would you not have backed a chaser ridden by Walsh on the basis of this ever lengthening statistic?I wouldn't.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30460271/walsh-over-fences?post_id=543964269#543964269</link><description>Put it another way.After years three....four....would you not have backed a chaser ridden by Walsh on the basis of this ever lengthening statistic?I wouldn't.</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:37:09 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Cant even see the point of stats like these. I see 5 years have become six for extra effect.Why not the nicholls/walsh chase stats for the last 10 years?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30460271/walsh-over-fences?post_id=543963973#543963973</link><description>Cant even see the point of stats like these. I see 5 years have become six for extra effect.Why not the nicholls/walsh chase stats for the last 10 years?</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:04:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>My opinion is that I think it would be fair to expect a jockey such as Walsh with his skill and ability which is far and away greater than the majority of his peers would have been able to have managed to have won on at least one of those, more to th</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30460271/walsh-over-fences?post_id=543963833#543963833</link><description>My opinion is that I think it would be fair to expect a jockey such as Walsh with his skill and ability which is far and away greater than the majority of his peers would have been able to have managed to have won on at least one of those, more to th</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:45:37 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Boston Bob (IRE)        Felix Yonger (IRE)    Arvika Ligeonniere (FR)    Ballycasey (IRE)    Champagne Fever (IRE)    Ulck Du Lin (FR)    Silviniaco Conti (FR)    Sweet My Lord (FR)    Ghizao (GER)    Marito (GER)    Sanctuaire (FR)    Unioniste (FR)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30460271/walsh-over-fences?post_id=543963711#543963711</link><description>Boston Bob (IRE)        Felix Yonger (IRE)    Arvika Ligeonniere (FR)    Ballycasey (IRE)    Champagne Fever (IRE)    Ulck Du Lin (FR)    Silviniaco Conti (FR)    Sweet My Lord (FR)    Ghizao (GER)    Marito (GER)    Sanctuaire (FR)    Unioniste (FR)</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:31:30 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Rath, it's not so much "what he should have won on" it's more about managing to win on something regardless of whether it was strictly entitled to!!! I'd be expecting a jockey of his quality to managed it more often.....In the intervening period I'm</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30460271/walsh-over-fences?post_id=543963491#543963491</link><description>Rath, it's not so much "what he should have won on" it's more about managing to win on something regardless of whether it was strictly entitled to!!! I'd be expecting a jockey of his quality to managed it more often.....In the intervening period I'm</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:09:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Which chasers should Walsh have won on during the intervening period ? Possibly Champagne Fever, cant think of him not getting the best out of anything else.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30460271/walsh-over-fences?post_id=543963385#543963385</link><description>Which chasers should Walsh have won on during the intervening period ? Possibly Champagne Fever, cant think of him not getting the best out of anything else.</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:02:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I doubt that it says that Duffy but it really is not six years - its really 5x4 days.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30460271/walsh-over-fences?post_id=543963379#543963379</link><description>I doubt that it says that Duffy but it really is not six years - its really 5x4 days.</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:01:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Just to point out here, I'm not saying that Nicholl's can't train or Walsh can't ride, I'm actually pointing out that as they are quite adept and those particular disciplines they should have done better than they have...that's all!!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30460271/walsh-over-fences?post_id=543963355#543963355</link><description>Just to point out here, I'm not saying that Nicholl's can't train or Walsh can't ride, I'm actually pointing out that as they are quite adept and those particular disciplines they should have done better than they have...that's all!!</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:59:03 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There's a few who wouldn't have got the better of UDS and he'd have bolted with them.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30460271/walsh-over-fences?post_id=543963327#543963327</link><description>There's a few who wouldn't have got the better of UDS and he'd have bolted with them.</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:55:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Arkle, isn't there some rule somewhere, not sure if it's in that drunk book of yours, and forgive me if I'm misquoting it but like you I'm not an expert...but it's something about over time and in this case 6 years, the competitor with the greater sk</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30460271/walsh-over-fences?post_id=543963321#543963321</link><description>Arkle, isn't there some rule somewhere, not sure if it's in that drunk book of yours, and forgive me if I'm misquoting it but like you I'm not an expert...but it's something about over time and in this case 6 years, the competitor with the greater sk</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:55:11 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
