<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: The Horses That Are Running For The Bookies?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30451199/the-horses-that-are-running-for-the-bookies</link><description>You know, the horses the bookies deliberately have kept way too short and keep plugging remorsely as prime contenders in their faux publicity for the Festival.My two in this category this year are The New One in the Champion Hurdle and Silvianaco Con</description><item><title>TNO Running for the bookies?  The bookies were desperate for TNO to beat Faugheen. It didn't win because it wasn't good enough.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30451199/the-horses-that-are-running-for-the-bookies?post_id=543957469#543957469</link><description>TNO Running for the bookies?  The bookies were desperate for TNO to beat Faugheen. It didn't win because it wasn't good enough.</description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:03:28 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>As predicted, they were running for the bookies and both beaten out of sight. 5th    &Acirc;&frac12;    7 The New One (IRE)    N A Twiston-Davies    7    11-10    S Twiston-Davies    10/3Jumped slightly right at times, disputed 2nd behind winner, not fluent 2nd,</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30451199/the-horses-that-are-running-for-the-bookies?post_id=543956127#543956127</link><description>As predicted, they were running for the bookies and both beaten out of sight. 5th    &Acirc;&frac12;    7 The New One (IRE)    N A Twiston-Davies    7    11-10    S Twiston-Davies    10/3Jumped slightly right at times, disputed 2nd behind winner, not fluent 2nd,</description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:38:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Mr Eboue, I mean that their chance of winnning is not refelected in their bookmaker odds, not that they can't win. Hence 'know' rather than just a plain know.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30451199/the-horses-that-are-running-for-the-bookies?post_id=543798163#543798163</link><description>Mr Eboue, I mean that their chance of winnning is not refelected in their bookmaker odds, not that they can't win. Hence 'know' rather than just a plain know.</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 14:13:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Not quite sure what this fred is on about, TNO beating Faugheen would be the best result of the whole festival for the bookies.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30451199/the-horses-that-are-running-for-the-bookies?post_id=543797741#543797741</link><description>Not quite sure what this fred is on about, TNO beating Faugheen would be the best result of the whole festival for the bookies.</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:38:52 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Your last sentence is laughable. No offence.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30451199/the-horses-that-are-running-for-the-bookies?post_id=543797623#543797623</link><description>Your last sentence is laughable. No offence.</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:27:45 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>You know, the horses the bookies deliberately have kept way too short and keep plugging remorsely as prime contenders in their faux publicity for the Festival.My two in this category this year are The New One in the Champion Hurdle and Silvianaco Con</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/30451199/the-horses-that-are-running-for-the-bookies?post_id=543797533#543797533</link><description>You know, the horses the bookies deliberately have kept way too short and keep plugging remorsely as prime contenders in their faux publicity for the Festival.My two in this category this year are The New One in the Champion Hurdle and Silvianaco Con</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 13:20:40 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
