<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: The organics vs synthetics  aka  stat/trends punters vs the knowledgable</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29790485/the-organics-vs-synthetics-aka-stattrends-punters-vs-the-knowledgable</link><description>I have noticed that the page readers and calculator holders get a little bit ruffled when people who actually know about horse racing go against one of their horses. As a punter who doesn't rely on statistics, it is satisfying to know that the syneth</description><item><title>A page back m8.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29790485/the-organics-vs-synthetics-aka-stattrends-punters-vs-the-knowledgable?post_id=529677171#529677171</link><description>A page back m8.</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 12:05:41 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Where's this thread Jasey?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29790485/the-organics-vs-synthetics-aka-stattrends-punters-vs-the-knowledgable?post_id=529676939#529676939</link><description>Where's this thread Jasey?</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:58:11 -0600</pubDate></item><item><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29790485/the-organics-vs-synthetics-aka-stattrends-punters-vs-the-knowledgable?post_id=529676227#529676227</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:36:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>To be fair the abuse goes both ways. Non-stats people have a go back and neither is complimentary. Get over it and get on with it!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29790485/the-organics-vs-synthetics-aka-stattrends-punters-vs-the-knowledgable?post_id=529676221#529676221</link><description>To be fair the abuse goes both ways. Non-stats people have a go back and neither is complimentary. Get over it and get on with it!</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:36:19 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I am not stats driven but I don't mind if people are guided by them more than other means, I just have a little poke at them in the context of this forum because they are delivered in a beligerent way IMO,if you question what judo says you will be ab</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29790485/the-organics-vs-synthetics-aka-stattrends-punters-vs-the-knowledgable?post_id=529676159#529676159</link><description>I am not stats driven but I don't mind if people are guided by them more than other means, I just have a little poke at them in the context of this forum because they are delivered in a beligerent way IMO,if you question what judo says you will be ab</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:34:19 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Graeme has put his lays up on another thread.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29790485/the-organics-vs-synthetics-aka-stattrends-punters-vs-the-knowledgable?post_id=529676125#529676125</link><description>Graeme has put his lays up on another thread.</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:33:07 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>The Great Graeme83. With another magnificent post...still lookin for all his bets so I can lay them though...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29790485/the-organics-vs-synthetics-aka-stattrends-punters-vs-the-knowledgable?post_id=529675321#529675321</link><description>The Great Graeme83. With another magnificent post...still lookin for all his bets so I can lay them though...</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 11:05:28 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Couple of good,sensible posts there.Probably cos i agree with themBut yes,they make sense,imo.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29790485/the-organics-vs-synthetics-aka-stattrends-punters-vs-the-knowledgable?post_id=529581187#529581187</link><description>Couple of good,sensible posts there.Probably cos i agree with themBut yes,they make sense,imo.</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 06:11:13 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>@roobuck, agree with you about not dismissing a horse based on stats, and the arguement on dynaste is a most pertinent one. Just because he doesn't fit the trends doesn't mean he can't win. Those stats applied to previous runners and not to him. Dyna</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29790485/the-organics-vs-synthetics-aka-stattrends-punters-vs-the-knowledgable?post_id=529580827#529580827</link><description>@roobuck, agree with you about not dismissing a horse based on stats, and the arguement on dynaste is a most pertinent one. Just because he doesn't fit the trends doesn't mean he can't win. Those stats applied to previous runners and not to him. Dyna</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 05:34:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I actually in regards to the topic there are broadly to schools of thought.First you have those like judo and JOCI who use trends and stats as a starting point and will on the whole eliminate horses that way to provide a short list and then make an e</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29790485/the-organics-vs-synthetics-aka-stattrends-punters-vs-the-knowledgable?post_id=529579825#529579825</link><description>I actually in regards to the topic there are broadly to schools of thought.First you have those like judo and JOCI who use trends and stats as a starting point and will on the whole eliminate horses that way to provide a short list and then make an e</description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 04:07:09 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
