<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: What will be the bottom rating (weight) in the Grand National this year?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29765309/what-will-be-the-bottom-rating-weight-in-the-grand-national-this-year</link><description>Looks a weakish field to me with only 83 entries potentially horses in the region of 132 may scrape in on 10-0?Thoughts?</description><item><title>Would love to see tartak get in but can't see it?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29765309/what-will-be-the-bottom-rating-weight-in-the-grand-national-this-year?post_id=529030425#529030425</link><description>Would love to see tartak get in but can't see it?</description><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 09:33:33 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Tidal Bay runs, handicapper will put him on 165/166 maybe. Anything under 140 could be running from out of it. My guess: Frisco Depot will be the last horse on 10-0. There'll be 6-7 horses running from out of the handicap.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29765309/what-will-be-the-bottom-rating-weight-in-the-grand-national-this-year?post_id=528950691#528950691</link><description>Tidal Bay runs, handicapper will put him on 165/166 maybe. Anything under 140 could be running from out of it. My guess: Frisco Depot will be the last horse on 10-0. There'll be 6-7 horses running from out of the handicap.</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:44:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm pretty sure the bottom weight will be 10-0 but what will be the bottom rating i.e 130, 140?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29765309/what-will-be-the-bottom-rating-weight-in-the-grand-national-this-year?post_id=528946319#528946319</link><description>I'm pretty sure the bottom weight will be 10-0 but what will be the bottom rating i.e 130, 140?</description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:10:44 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>jasey right...difficult till the weights are published but tidal bay looking like being a runner...i'd say they will let him run off 168 which would mean 144 ish would be 10 stone with the top weight running off 11-10...lots depend on tidal bay tbh</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29765309/what-will-be-the-bottom-rating-weight-in-the-grand-national-this-year?post_id=528911351#528911351</link><description>jasey right...difficult till the weights are published but tidal bay looking like being a runner...i'd say they will let him run off 168 which would mean 144 ish would be 10 stone with the top weight running off 11-10...lots depend on tidal bay tbh</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:58:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>M8 this is a festival forum</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29765309/what-will-be-the-bottom-rating-weight-in-the-grand-national-this-year?post_id=528911213#528911213</link><description>M8 this is a festival forum</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:46:56 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Any thoughts?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29765309/what-will-be-the-bottom-rating-weight-in-the-grand-national-this-year?post_id=528911117#528911117</link><description>Any thoughts?</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:39:03 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Looks a weakish field to me with only 83 entries potentially horses in the region of 132 may scrape in on 10-0?Thoughts?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29765309/what-will-be-the-bottom-rating-weight-in-the-grand-national-this-year?post_id=528886939#528886939</link><description>Looks a weakish field to me with only 83 entries potentially horses in the region of 132 may scrape in on 10-0?Thoughts?</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 05:20:38 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
