<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Back to nags winning the Gold Cup</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29001545/back-to-nags-winning-the-gold-cup</link><description>After the amazing Best Mate then Kauto Star and Denman era we are now back to handicappers winning Gold Cups. Excellent bah humbug.</description><item><title>As usual Eric my biggest bet of the year was on the going and I told everyone on here that the best bet I'd ever seen was the 7/2 on good ground - the race results were irrelevant after that came in, though I still won 3 out of the 4 days. yawn</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29001545/back-to-nags-winning-the-gold-cup?post_id=517618795#517618795</link><description>As usual Eric my biggest bet of the year was on the going and I told everyone on here that the best bet I'd ever seen was the 7/2 on good ground - the race results were irrelevant after that came in, though I still won 3 out of the 4 days. yawn</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:49:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I underestimated the horses ability to go with them and hearty congratulations to connections. I hope it doesn't sound like sour grapes but had the race been run as it has in recent seasons then I think he would at best have been second.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29001545/back-to-nags-winning-the-gold-cup?post_id=517617299#517617299</link><description>I underestimated the horses ability to go with them and hearty congratulations to connections. I hope it doesn't sound like sour grapes but had the race been run as it has in recent seasons then I think he would at best have been second.</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:00:20 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>yes he might as well have said "must be shitt because I lost"</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29001545/back-to-nags-winning-the-gold-cup?post_id=517616721#517616721</link><description>yes he might as well have said "must be shitt because I lost"</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:46:11 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Glad to see that Eric's taken it in such a sporting manner as usual</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29001545/back-to-nags-winning-the-gold-cup?post_id=517616401#517616401</link><description>Glad to see that Eric's taken it in such a sporting manner as usual</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:38:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>eric_morrisWhen: 16 Mar 12 17:06Not interested tbh the damp squib started with Hurricane Fly, moved onto Sizing Europe, Big Bucks the only glimmer of light, then Boston Bob setting it up for a poor Gold Cup. Not worth all the grief and lies from conn</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29001545/back-to-nags-winning-the-gold-cup?post_id=517616369#517616369</link><description>eric_morrisWhen: 16 Mar 12 17:06Not interested tbh the damp squib started with Hurricane Fly, moved onto Sizing Europe, Big Bucks the only glimmer of light, then Boston Bob setting it up for a poor Gold Cup. Not worth all the grief and lies from conn</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:36:02 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>People constantly underestimated this horse and i'm not one bit suprised he won.If you want to appreciate a true sportsman who gives so much to the sport of horseracing then see John McManus</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29001545/back-to-nags-winning-the-gold-cup?post_id=517613705#517613705</link><description>People constantly underestimated this horse and i'm not one bit suprised he won.If you want to appreciate a true sportsman who gives so much to the sport of horseracing then see John McManus</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:27:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>looks a fast time thieves</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29001545/back-to-nags-winning-the-gold-cup?post_id=517611719#517611719</link><description>looks a fast time thieves</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:28:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Not a poor winner, just a normal winner!  Same as last year.  Same as most years until Kauto, Denman and Imperial Commander came along.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29001545/back-to-nags-winning-the-gold-cup?post_id=517611635#517611635</link><description>Not a poor winner, just a normal winner!  Same as last year.  Same as most years until Kauto, Denman and Imperial Commander came along.</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:25:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>its a unique race that throws up crazy priced place horseswe have been spoiled with the class horses the last few years and this year we have witnessed a poor winner imobut hats off to connections and backershopefully some of this years novices will</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29001545/back-to-nags-winning-the-gold-cup?post_id=517610717#517610717</link><description>its a unique race that throws up crazy priced place horseswe have been spoiled with the class horses the last few years and this year we have witnessed a poor winner imobut hats off to connections and backershopefully some of this years novices will</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:56:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>it's the same argument as "Al Ferof beat SS in the Supreme last year so should do so again"It doesn't allow for improvement and after just a handful of runs the winner was entitled to improve. Was already a proven stayer.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/29001545/back-to-nags-winning-the-gold-cup?post_id=517610591#517610591</link><description>it's the same argument as "Al Ferof beat SS in the Supreme last year so should do so again"It doesn't allow for improvement and after just a handful of runs the winner was entitled to improve. Was already a proven stayer.</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:53:18 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
