New Posts For Thread: Of these 4 short ones?https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/28927757/of-these-4-short-onesHurricane Fly, Quevega, Sizing Europe, Big Bucks.They are all short priced favs. I really fancy the 4 of them but my head is telling me they won't all win. So to that end, I'm looking at it from another angle.What could possibly beat them?Hurricane FI think they probably made their decision on that when they took CH out last week.https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/28927757/of-these-4-short-ones?post_id=516590329#516590329I think they probably made their decision on that when they took CH out last week.Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:30:59 -0600Sorry, meant to say CH would have to be supplemented, which I guess they would do if really worried about lack of pace.https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/28927757/of-these-4-short-ones?post_id=516585621#516585621Sorry, meant to say CH would have to be supplemented, which I guess they would do if really worried about lack of pace.Sun, 19 Feb 2012 23:20:52 -0600Fair enough chaps - as you say I'm sure Ruby will be alive to the situation and will have a back up plan. With Restless Harry's connections swerving the contest now it seemed the last natural front runner had left the building. I hope Big Bucks doeshttps://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/28927757/of-these-4-short-ones?post_id=516546511#516546511Fair enough chaps - as you say I'm sure Ruby will be alive to the situation and will have a back up plan. With Restless Harry's connections swerving the contest now it seemed the last natural front runner had left the building. I hope Big Bucks doesSun, 19 Feb 2012 02:45:31 -0600Rod - If Paul Nicholls/Andy Stewart were concerned about lack of pace they could always use Celestial Halo for that. But in any case, I agree with Strontium; Ruby will just take it up 6f out if the pace is weak, and I don't see that being a problem fhttps://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/28927757/of-these-4-short-ones?post_id=516545683#516545683Rod - If Paul Nicholls/Andy Stewart were concerned about lack of pace they could always use Celestial Halo for that. But in any case, I agree with Strontium; Ruby will just take it up 6f out if the pace is weak, and I don't see that being a problem fSun, 19 Feb 2012 01:34:40 -0600STRONTIUM --- good post - i dont know how much more of this i can handle - i really do need sedativeshttps://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/28927757/of-these-4-short-ones?post_id=516534519#516534519STRONTIUM --- good post - i dont know how much more of this i can handle - i really do need sedativesSat, 18 Feb 2012 16:43:31 -0600Rod, I don't think you'll beat Big Buck's like that. Once he quickens he goes and he keeps going (and usually comes back on the bridle). The only way I can see even a speed horse beating him is by doing him on the line.If Ruby thinks it's a slowly ruhttps://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/28927757/of-these-4-short-ones?post_id=516524111#516524111Rod, I don't think you'll beat Big Buck's like that. Once he quickens he goes and he keeps going (and usually comes back on the bridle). The only way I can see even a speed horse beating him is by doing him on the line.If Ruby thinks it's a slowly ruSat, 18 Feb 2012 12:39:15 -0600I'm getting a little concerned for Big Bucks tbh - of course he's the best horse in race but cant see what on earth will want to make it a decent pace in the race and it becoming a farce (unless Thousand Stars wants to make it a stamina test and becohttps://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/28927757/of-these-4-short-ones?post_id=516523741#516523741I'm getting a little concerned for Big Bucks tbh - of course he's the best horse in race but cant see what on earth will want to make it a decent pace in the race and it becoming a farce (unless Thousand Stars wants to make it a stamina test and becoSat, 18 Feb 2012 12:29:02 -0600A "2003 scenario" where all 4 win is not massively improbable imo. Would trigger enormous profits warnings from the big bookies as well, which would be fun.https://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/28927757/of-these-4-short-ones?post_id=516502023#516502023A "2003 scenario" where all 4 win is not massively improbable imo. Would trigger enormous profits warnings from the big bookies as well, which would be fun.Sat, 18 Feb 2012 00:40:51 -0600HF did not settle in first half of the race and used up valuable energy - and still beat the unbeaten peddlers -NAP of the meeting for me - if it settles better this thing will provide the biggst winning distance in the championship -events Up therehttps://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/28927757/of-these-4-short-ones?post_id=516485881#516485881HF did not settle in first half of the race and used up valuable energy - and still beat the unbeaten peddlers -NAP of the meeting for me - if it settles better this thing will provide the biggst winning distance in the championship -events Up thereFri, 17 Feb 2012 15:15:26 -0600Agree with the post above from strontiumhttps://community.betfair.com/cheltenham2011/go/thread/view/113609/28927757/of-these-4-short-ones?post_id=516484751#516484751Agree with the post above from strontiumFri, 17 Feb 2012 14:51:43 -0600