<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Quigg v Munroe</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29182575/quigg-v-munroe</link><description>I make Munroe a good thing here.  Am I missing something?</description><item><title>the bookies would be making it up if they settled on anything but the draw lol</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29182575/quigg-v-munroe?post_id=520943403#520943403</link><description>the bookies would be making it up if they settled on anything but the draw lol</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:44:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>any links to replays of this? Completely missed the punch that put rhodes down and wouldn't mind seeing the round where Towers was horizontal on the ropes again.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29182575/quigg-v-munroe?post_id=520925673#520925673</link><description>any links to replays of this? Completely missed the punch that put rhodes down and wouldn't mind seeing the round where Towers was horizontal on the ropes again.</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:38:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>the decision was a technical draw,which is the correct settlement.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29182575/quigg-v-munroe?post_id=520920101#520920101</link><description>the decision was a technical draw,which is the correct settlement.</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 08:17:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You can't just go making the rules up as you go, the truth of the matter is the people who were paid out on the draw were wrongly paid out. The official decision will be changed to a No Decision when the incompetence of the BBBoC who was also a WBA o</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29182575/quigg-v-munroe?post_id=520916821#520916821</link><description>You can't just go making the rules up as you go, the truth of the matter is the people who were paid out on the draw were wrongly paid out. The official decision will be changed to a No Decision when the incompetence of the BBBoC who was also a WBA o</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 05:57:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm not denying what the rules say, just that bookies will pay out on whatever the official decision is, right or wrong, if they change it all those people on the draw will be straight to IBAS, it's no different to trying them to get the first Dawson</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29182575/quigg-v-munroe?post_id=520916299#520916299</link><description>I'm not denying what the rules say, just that bookies will pay out on whatever the official decision is, right or wrong, if they change it all those people on the draw will be straight to IBAS, it's no different to trying them to get the first Dawson</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 05:31:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I had a bet on munroe to win with PP. To my amazement they said that as the official result was a technical draw, that a draw is their official result as well. I have forwarded the WBA rule to their customer services and they are now reviewing wether</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29182575/quigg-v-munroe?post_id=520914745#520914745</link><description>I had a bet on munroe to win with PP. To my amazement they said that as the official result was a technical draw, that a draw is their official result as well. I have forwarded the WBA rule to their customer services and they are now reviewing wether</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 03:19:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Here's the WBA's rules, they don't even have a Technical Draw as a ruling.b) ACCIDENTAL BLOWS: If the referee sees, or after consulting withthe doctor he concludes that a boxer has been injured in an accidentalmanner, and as a consequence of this wou</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29182575/quigg-v-munroe?post_id=520914209#520914209</link><description>Here's the WBA's rules, they don't even have a Technical Draw as a ruling.b) ACCIDENTAL BLOWS: If the referee sees, or after consulting withthe doctor he concludes that a boxer has been injured in an accidentalmanner, and as a consequence of this wou</description><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 02:06:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>they just go on the 'official' decision though don't they</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29182575/quigg-v-munroe?post_id=520910419#520910419</link><description>they just go on the 'official' decision though don't they</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:42:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>just back from this, what a disappointing night. Towers fight was farcical, Rhodes disappointing then just bad luck with the cut. Fair amount of mither in the crowd after aswell, Munroe fans at ringside charging across the cycle track and getting stu</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29182575/quigg-v-munroe?post_id=520908849#520908849</link><description>just back from this, what a disappointing night. Towers fight was farcical, Rhodes disappointing then just bad luck with the cut. Fair amount of mither in the crowd after aswell, Munroe fans at ringside charging across the cycle track and getting stu</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:34:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This fight was for the interim WBA World super bantamweight title, under WBA rules its a no decision. The WBA don't have a technical draw outcome in their rules.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29182575/quigg-v-munroe?post_id=520908019#520908019</link><description>This fight was for the interim WBA World super bantamweight title, under WBA rules its a no decision. The WBA don't have a technical draw outcome in their rules.</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:57:37 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
