<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Peterson failed drugs test!!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29105741/peterson-failed-drugs-test</link><description>over on fighthype.</description><item><title>Yep, I said how in my post above, in short natural testosterone has more of one 'type' of carbon in because of the way we 'make' it naturally as opposed to how the Pharma companies produce it.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29105741/peterson-failed-drugs-test?post_id=519600061#519600061</link><description>Yep, I said how in my post above, in short natural testosterone has more of one 'type' of carbon in because of the way we 'make' it naturally as opposed to how the Pharma companies produce it.</description><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 07:03:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>How has he 'failed' the test then? Is it more the makeup of his testosterone they've not been happy with? I keep reading 'synthetic' as if they've picked up by texture that his levels are dodgy.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29105741/peterson-failed-drugs-test?post_id=519598259#519598259</link><description>How has he 'failed' the test then? Is it more the makeup of his testosterone they've not been happy with? I keep reading 'synthetic' as if they've picked up by texture that his levels are dodgy.</description><pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 05:49:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>They are also 4:1 as they follow WADA's guidelines.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29105741/peterson-failed-drugs-test?post_id=519592727#519592727</link><description>They are also 4:1 as they follow WADA's guidelines.</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:52:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Sorry wrong again, testing was taken out by VADA (voluntary anti-doping agency), presume their red light levels are lower than WADA's 4:1?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29105741/peterson-failed-drugs-test?post_id=519591663#519591663</link><description>Sorry wrong again, testing was taken out by VADA (voluntary anti-doping agency), presume their red light levels are lower than WADA's 4:1?</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 20:34:09 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>WADA use the Carbon Isotope Test as well which can determine if the testosterone present is natural or synthetic. His only mistake was not telling anyone he was receiving TRT, it's not really the same as Overeem whose ratio was something like 16:1</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29105741/peterson-failed-drugs-test?post_id=519584339#519584339</link><description>WADA use the Carbon Isotope Test as well which can determine if the testosterone present is natural or synthetic. His only mistake was not telling anyone he was receiving TRT, it's not really the same as Overeem whose ratio was something like 16:1</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 15:02:53 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Just seen Conte post 3.77-1, which is defo someone using when the norm is 1:1 but not a drug cheat by the silly law. How has he failed the test then?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29105741/peterson-failed-drugs-test?post_id=519584071#519584071</link><description>Just seen Conte post 3.77-1, which is defo someone using when the norm is 1:1 but not a drug cheat by the silly law. How has he failed the test then?</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 14:54:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>he was 3.77/1</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29105741/peterson-failed-drugs-test?post_id=519583497#519583497</link><description>he was 3.77/1</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 14:36:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I think you're right mate having had a look, but that doesn't mean he was within the 4:1, presuming you meant he was within the 6:1 of Nevada?Surely it's time they changed these ratio's?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29105741/peterson-failed-drugs-test?post_id=519579171#519579171</link><description>I think you're right mate having had a look, but that doesn't mean he was within the 4:1, presuming you meant he was within the 6:1 of Nevada?Surely it's time they changed these ratio's?</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:44:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>WADA's is 4:1 as far as I'm aware as well</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29105741/peterson-failed-drugs-test?post_id=519574821#519574821</link><description>WADA's is 4:1 as far as I'm aware as well</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 10:47:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>He was within the ridiculous USADA ratio of 4:1 and Nevada's 6:1, not of WADA's test requirement who were dealing with it at Team Peterson's request. Just shows how outrageously flexible and flawed the regular boxing testing system is</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/boxing/go/thread/view/94022/29105741/peterson-failed-drugs-test?post_id=519573723#519573723</link><description>He was within the ridiculous USADA ratio of 4:1 and Nevada's 6:1, not of WADA's test requirement who were dealing with it at Team Peterson's request. Just shows how outrageously flexible and flawed the regular boxing testing system is</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 10:19:17 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
