<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: return of mares</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/31739189/return-of-mares</link><description>2021 season MEHMAS 292WOOTTON BASSETT 244KODIAC 238LOPE DE VEGA 191NEW BAY 186DARK  ANGEL 180NIGHT OF THUNDER 177DANDY MAN 176KINGMAN 172SEA THE STARS 165AUSTRALIA 162SHOWCASING 156FRANKEL 151DUBAWI 138INVINCIBLE SPIRIT 127GOLDEN HORN 82MAYSON 71SIYO</description><item><title>totally agreewe need to hit back. stop going to stallions covering more than 200 mares, its not good for anyone. funny thing is, i actually think the big studs would be better off too. what stallion's book this year caught your eye on numbers (big or</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/31739189/return-of-mares?post_id=562679957#562679957</link><description>totally agreewe need to hit back. stop going to stallions covering more than 200 mares, its not good for anyone. funny thing is, i actually think the big studs would be better off too. what stallion's book this year caught your eye on numbers (big or</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:03:17 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>totally agreewe need to hit back. stop going to stallions covering more than 200 mares, its not good for anyone. funny thing is, i actually think the big studs would be better off too. what stallion's book this year caught your eye on numbers (big or</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/31739189/return-of-mares?post_id=562679953#562679953</link><description>totally agreewe need to hit back. stop going to stallions covering more than 200 mares, its not good for anyone. funny thing is, i actually think the big studs would be better off too. what stallion's book this year caught your eye on numbers (big or</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:03:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Arrived yesterday Wily, took long enough I felt too!37 pages of mares covered by more than one stallion.5 of those by 3 stallions.2 entries for mares covered by 4 stallions.Marvellous things these mega books, aren&acirc;&#x80;&#x99;t they?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/31739189/return-of-mares?post_id=562677339#562677339</link><description>Arrived yesterday Wily, took long enough I felt too!37 pages of mares covered by more than one stallion.5 of those by 3 stallions.2 entries for mares covered by 4 stallions.Marvellous things these mega books, aren&acirc;&#x80;&#x99;t they?</description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 05:00:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Return of mares 2022 should be out soonanyone received theirs? any surprise numbers?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/31739189/return-of-mares?post_id=562676381#562676381</link><description>Return of mares 2022 should be out soonanyone received theirs? any surprise numbers?</description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 14:38:09 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes the failure of the U S cap was disappointing if not totally unexpected.Talking to a stallion manager recently he said that he is hardly ever asked about the stallion book size anymore. I don&acirc;&#x80;&#x99;t know if that is a convenient view on his part but I</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/31739189/return-of-mares?post_id=561944289#561944289</link><description>Yes the failure of the U S cap was disappointing if not totally unexpected.Talking to a stallion manager recently he said that he is hardly ever asked about the stallion book size anymore. I don&acirc;&#x80;&#x99;t know if that is a convenient view on his part but I</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 16:25:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I remember back to the days when 40 was the max...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/31739189/return-of-mares?post_id=561942753#561942753</link><description>I remember back to the days when 40 was the max...</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:02:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Does anyone else other than me ask what the max number a stallion will cover that season before booking the nomination? I often hear that breeders who are disappointed that the stallion they chose covered so many mares, and I wonder ...did you ask or</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/31739189/return-of-mares?post_id=561942121#561942121</link><description>Does anyone else other than me ask what the max number a stallion will cover that season before booking the nomination? I often hear that breeders who are disappointed that the stallion they chose covered so many mares, and I wonder ...did you ask or</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:43:03 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>2021 season MEHMAS 292WOOTTON BASSETT 244KODIAC 238LOPE DE VEGA 191NEW BAY 186DARK  ANGEL 180NIGHT OF THUNDER 177DANDY MAN 176KINGMAN 172SEA THE STARS 165AUSTRALIA 162SHOWCASING 156FRANKEL 151DUBAWI 138INVINCIBLE SPIRIT 127GOLDEN HORN 82MAYSON 71SIYO</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/31739189/return-of-mares?post_id=561742483#561742483</link><description>2021 season MEHMAS 292WOOTTON BASSETT 244KODIAC 238LOPE DE VEGA 191NEW BAY 186DARK  ANGEL 180NIGHT OF THUNDER 177DANDY MAN 176KINGMAN 172SEA THE STARS 165AUSTRALIA 162SHOWCASING 156FRANKEL 151DUBAWI 138INVINCIBLE SPIRIT 127GOLDEN HORN 82MAYSON 71SIYO</description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 15:03:14 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
