<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Is that it for 2016</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/30636811/is-that-it-for-2016</link><description>Is that it for 2016 truehonchotruehoncho 19 Nov 15 13:07 Joined: 11 Dec 10 | Topic/replies: 761 | Blogger: truehoncho's blogAre there anymore 1st seasoners likely to emerge for next year, or will I have to work with whats on offer currently?Share|rep</description><item><title>Many thanks for the offer Proxygene, but nicking leaves out too many other influences in the pedigree for me and I get everything I need with the  Equineline hypothetical mating facility. My aim is firstly to produce sound stock, secondly for the sal</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/30636811/is-that-it-for-2016?post_id=547431717#547431717</link><description>Many thanks for the offer Proxygene, but nicking leaves out too many other influences in the pedigree for me and I get everything I need with the  Equineline hypothetical mating facility. My aim is firstly to produce sound stock, secondly for the sal</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 05:38:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Hi Proxygene, top marks for persistence getting this thread back. I don't disagree with any of you latest comments, in particular I probably don't take enough account of market expectations when it comes to nicks. Its something I will consider in fut</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/30636811/is-that-it-for-2016?post_id=547414957#547414957</link><description>Hi Proxygene, top marks for persistence getting this thread back. I don't disagree with any of you latest comments, in particular I probably don't take enough account of market expectations when it comes to nicks. Its something I will consider in fut</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:16:05 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Formtwist, If you don't mind unsolicited (esoteric?) lists; to use as you wish gratis, the invite is there to PM me your mare names. Home isn't really geared up for rearing so for me the cost of waiting on fillies as yearlings has outweighed the upsi</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/30636811/is-that-it-for-2016?post_id=547412103#547412103</link><description>Formtwist, If you don't mind unsolicited (esoteric?) lists; to use as you wish gratis, the invite is there to PM me your mare names. Home isn't really geared up for rearing so for me the cost of waiting on fillies as yearlings has outweighed the upsi</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:31:23 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>You clearly are a scientist, nicely explained thanks. I know the big studs use them a lot but I haven't tried them for price reasons mostly, though I probably prefer to trust to instinct and my amateurish ideas of pedigree matches in selecting stalli</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/30636811/is-that-it-for-2016?post_id=547410901#547410901</link><description>You clearly are a scientist, nicely explained thanks. I know the big studs use them a lot but I haven't tried them for price reasons mostly, though I probably prefer to trust to instinct and my amateurish ideas of pedigree matches in selecting stalli</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:15:25 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Hi Formtwist,I would like to think I maintain an objective cynicism to most things, and with adequate funds would be happy to target followers of genetic testing too. As a recent breeder I admit to having used such tests, out of curiosity as much as</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/30636811/is-that-it-for-2016?post_id=547408117#547408117</link><description>Hi Formtwist,I would like to think I maintain an objective cynicism to most things, and with adequate funds would be happy to target followers of genetic testing too. As a recent breeder I admit to having used such tests, out of curiosity as much as</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 04:46:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Proxy, I'm impressed by your skill and tenacity, but perhaps a new thread on approaches to breeding might be worth it given how we have wandered off topic as usual? Your computer based nick finding is your raison d'etre but with the scientist in your</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/30636811/is-that-it-for-2016?post_id=547407195#547407195</link><description>Proxy, I'm impressed by your skill and tenacity, but perhaps a new thread on approaches to breeding might be worth it given how we have wandered off topic as usual? Your computer based nick finding is your raison d'etre but with the scientist in your</description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2016 01:49:42 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>A rather inelegant reconstruction but a salvage attempt</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/30636811/is-that-it-for-2016?post_id=547395871#547395871</link><description>A rather inelegant reconstruction but a salvage attempt</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 05:08:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Is that it for 2016 truehonchotruehoncho 19 Nov 15 13:07 Joined: 11 Dec 10 | Topic/replies: 761 | Blogger: truehoncho's blogAre there anymore 1st seasoners likely to emerge for next year, or will I have to work with whats on offer currently?Share|rep</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/30636811/is-that-it-for-2016?post_id=547395865#547395865</link><description>Is that it for 2016 truehonchotruehoncho 19 Nov 15 13:07 Joined: 11 Dec 10 | Topic/replies: 761 | Blogger: truehoncho's blogAre there anymore 1st seasoners likely to emerge for next year, or will I have to work with whats on offer currently?Share|rep</description><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 05:07:42 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
