<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Selecting winning yearlings</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/29412399/selecting-winning-yearlings</link><description>This is something I have threatened to do many times and is loosely based on Sageform's winning stallion stats, Steve Taplin's 2yo annual and, most recently, truehoncho's attempt to predict the future stallions from Tatts Book 1 (my aim is more modes</description><item><title>invincible spirit fillies going through the roof with coolemore buying up at any price</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/29412399/selecting-winning-yearlings?post_id=524922569#524922569</link><description>invincible spirit fillies going through the roof with coolemore buying up at any price</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 10:56:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>DMCK   regarding CC  so far 3 gone through ring book 1 120k  190k and a filly 90k</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/29412399/selecting-winning-yearlings?post_id=524921645#524921645</link><description>DMCK   regarding CC  so far 3 gone through ring book 1 120k  190k and a filly 90k</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 10:27:26 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>given its sales season it might be interesting for those with an interest to note how well Invincible Spirit and Cape Cross are doing, both standing in 2012 for reasonable fees given they are proven and both have sons at stud who could make it or equ</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/29412399/selecting-winning-yearlings?post_id=524919179#524919179</link><description>given its sales season it might be interesting for those with an interest to note how well Invincible Spirit and Cape Cross are doing, both standing in 2012 for reasonable fees given they are proven and both have sons at stud who could make it or equ</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 09:00:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>POTM - two words,New Approach.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/29412399/selecting-winning-yearlings?post_id=524918433#524918433</link><description>POTM - two words,New Approach.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 08:35:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm surprised you read my post atall R.A., I'm not sure I'd botherGood luck with your research, my most significant point would be to ignore the unproven sire as his best sales horses may still be useless along with his cheapies.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/29412399/selecting-winning-yearlings?post_id=524916183#524916183</link><description>I'm surprised you read my post atall R.A., I'm not sure I'd botherGood luck with your research, my most significant point would be to ignore the unproven sire as his best sales horses may still be useless along with his cheapies.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:11:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>potm: on re-reading your post (properly!) I see that I have merely repeated most of the points you made so apologies.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/29412399/selecting-winning-yearlings?post_id=524913509#524913509</link><description>potm: on re-reading your post (properly!) I see that I have merely repeated most of the points you made so apologies.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 04:54:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>thanks for the contributions.I didn't ignore conformation dominion but its something I neither have an expertise in nor do I attend many sales. I make the assumption that certain horses that make decent money (and you try to ignore some of potm's pit</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/29412399/selecting-winning-yearlings?post_id=524913463#524913463</link><description>thanks for the contributions.I didn't ignore conformation dominion but its something I neither have an expertise in nor do I attend many sales. I make the assumption that certain horses that make decent money (and you try to ignore some of potm's pit</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 04:51:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>In fairness to Royal Academy, he did state that he was coming at this from a betting angle and therefore he is never going to be watching the yearlings wander round a sales ring. Conformation is not going to be a factor that is available to him surel</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/29412399/selecting-winning-yearlings?post_id=524901171#524901171</link><description>In fairness to Royal Academy, he did state that he was coming at this from a betting angle and therefore he is never going to be watching the yearlings wander round a sales ring. Conformation is not going to be a factor that is available to him surel</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:28:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Couldn't agree more - isn't that why the Hannon Team are so good - individual first, pedigree second?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/29412399/selecting-winning-yearlings?post_id=524900589#524900589</link><description>Couldn't agree more - isn't that why the Hannon Team are so good - individual first, pedigree second?</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 16:10:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You have made one serious omission - conformation.Both physical and mental.The pedigree is only part of the story (probably less than stud managers would have us believe).</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/29412399/selecting-winning-yearlings?post_id=524850749#524850749</link><description>You have made one serious omission - conformation.Both physical and mental.The pedigree is only part of the story (probably less than stud managers would have us believe).</description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 08:24:08 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
