<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Noble Prince</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/27270269/noble-prince</link><description>Im sure the original plan wasnt a Cheltenham winner but a general question on the subject:How detrimental is it to have jumps winners on a mares page when the plan is top 2 year olds and the Guineas?!!</description><item><title>It's not exactly popular S S.Obviously if your second dam is Courtly Dee or Best in Show then I wouldn't be too worried! It does all depend on the strength of your page as to how much a buyer thinks he/she can wear N.H. form in a pedigree, and it's a</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/27270269/noble-prince?post_id=489644917#489644917</link><description>It's not exactly popular S S.Obviously if your second dam is Courtly Dee or Best in Show then I wouldn't be too worried! It does all depend on the strength of your page as to how much a buyer thinks he/she can wear N.H. form in a pedigree, and it's a</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:51:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Im sure the original plan wasnt a Cheltenham winner but a general question on the subject:How detrimental is it to have jumps winners on a mares page when the plan is top 2 year olds and the Guineas?!!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/27270269/noble-prince?post_id=489588397#489588397</link><description>Im sure the original plan wasnt a Cheltenham winner but a general question on the subject:How detrimental is it to have jumps winners on a mares page when the plan is top 2 year olds and the Guineas?!!</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 04:19:17 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
