<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: If as Henry cecil said on Saturday</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/25957173/if-as-henry-cecil-said-on-saturday</link><description>70% of a horse "staying " ability is down to the dams side why is such an importance put on sires preferences for differing types of going?Or is it for going preferences sire is dominant .</description><item><title>I believe such anecdotal 'evidence' has in no way been proved by geneticists geoff m, so I won't join in and muddy the waters any further!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/25957173/if-as-henry-cecil-said-on-saturday?post_id=468263197#468263197</link><description>I believe such anecdotal 'evidence' has in no way been proved by geneticists geoff m, so I won't join in and muddy the waters any further!</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:59:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>70% of a horse "staying " ability is down to the dams side why is such an importance put on sires preferences for differing types of going?Or is it for going preferences sire is dominant .</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/bloodstock__breeding/go/thread/view/94018/25957173/if-as-henry-cecil-said-on-saturday?post_id=468248221#468248221</link><description>70% of a horse "staying " ability is down to the dams side why is such an importance put on sires preferences for differing types of going?Or is it for going preferences sire is dominant .</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:51:18 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
