<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: The Silivikrin hand-job debate</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/big_brother_11/go/thread/view/110169/25559489/the-silivikrin-hand-job-debate</link><description>Did she or didn&amp;#039;t she?Although the visual evidence is open to interpretation the irrefutable evidence is the fact that he didn&amp;#039;t spend every subsequent night in her bed.Unless (or even if) he was gay, surely a guaranteed nightly hand-job in</description><item><title>seen her</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/big_brother_11/go/thread/view/110169/25559489/the-silivikrin-hand-job-debate?post_id=460732065#460732065</link><description>seen her</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 18:15:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>VVhe seen mate when he was outside watching with us...why do think he's not really interested...just sleeping in her bed to be nice and knows she's popular</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/big_brother_11/go/thread/view/110169/25559489/the-silivikrin-hand-job-debate?post_id=460732025#460732025</link><description>VVhe seen mate when he was outside watching with us...why do think he's not really interested...just sleeping in her bed to be nice and knows she's popular</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 18:15:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The flaw in that argument is that she has a really good body (even if she was a bag-on-the-head job you still would) but she's rather nice looking too, albeit with make-up, and I suspect she would have been very careful not to let JJ see her wit</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/big_brother_11/go/thread/view/110169/25559489/the-silivikrin-hand-job-debate?post_id=460731609#460731609</link><description>The flaw in that argument is that she has a really good body (even if she was a bag-on-the-head job you still would) but she's rather nice looking too, albeit with make-up, and I suspect she would have been very careful not to let JJ see her wit</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 18:11:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Of course it wasn't, but BBBM like to hint it was for the sake of  a few cheap gags.And the HL's hint at it for some cheap newspaper coverage.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/big_brother_11/go/thread/view/110169/25559489/the-silivikrin-hand-job-debate?post_id=460731093#460731093</link><description>Of course it wasn't, but BBBM like to hint it was for the sake of  a few cheap gags.And the HL's hint at it for some cheap newspaper coverage.</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 18:07:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>why didnt he go backwhat would you do if you woke up and realised freddy kreuger wan ked you off...run a mile innit, we've all woke up to horror's surely....i usually boot mine out the door straight after and direct them to the taxi rank</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/big_brother_11/go/thread/view/110169/25559489/the-silivikrin-hand-job-debate?post_id=460731001#460731001</link><description>why didnt he go backwhat would you do if you woke up and realised freddy kreuger wan ked you off...run a mile innit, we've all woke up to horror's surely....i usually boot mine out the door straight after and direct them to the taxi rank</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 18:07:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>they have 20 cameras in the bedroom, mics, other people.. and they can only "assume". Its obvious they didn't, but pretending they did makes for something to talk about on big mouth.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/big_brother_11/go/thread/view/110169/25559489/the-silivikrin-hand-job-debate?post_id=460730905#460730905</link><description>they have 20 cameras in the bedroom, mics, other people.. and they can only "assume". Its obvious they didn't, but pretending they did makes for something to talk about on big mouth.</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 18:06:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It certainly looked that way (notwithstanding the "3 foot d!ck" argument), but why didn't he go back for more?Maybe Sir Chubbence of Hardonshire did a Lord Lucan instead.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/big_brother_11/go/thread/view/110169/25559489/the-silivikrin-hand-job-debate?post_id=460730689#460730689</link><description>It certainly looked that way (notwithstanding the "3 foot d!ck" argument), but why didn't he go back for more?Maybe Sir Chubbence of Hardonshire did a Lord Lucan instead.</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 18:04:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>she was p!ssed as a fart, 90% it was a hand job...most birds are dirty sl ags on the pop</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/big_brother_11/go/thread/view/110169/25559489/the-silivikrin-hand-job-debate?post_id=460730049#460730049</link><description>she was p!ssed as a fart, 90% it was a hand job...most birds are dirty sl ags on the pop</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:59:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Did she or didn't she?Although the visual evidence is open to interpretation the irrefutable evidence is the fact that he didn't spend every subsequent night in her bed.Unless (or even if) he was gay, surely a guaranteed nightly hand-job in</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/big_brother_11/go/thread/view/110169/25559489/the-silivikrin-hand-job-debate?post_id=460729813#460729813</link><description>Did she or didn't she?Although the visual evidence is open to interpretation the irrefutable evidence is the fact that he didn't spend every subsequent night in her bed.Unless (or even if) he was gay, surely a guaranteed nightly hand-job in</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:57:44 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
