Forums

Basketball

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
n88uk
11 Feb 13 22:00
Joined:
Date Joined: 26 May 12
| Topic/replies: 187,774 | Blogger: n88uk's blog
Does anyone know why Indiana are so short?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 5  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 198
By:
map
When: 11 Feb 13 22:22
no clue..hi all btw
By:
werthecardinals
When: 11 Feb 13 22:36
Because d Williams is out
By:
West Coast Eagles
When: 11 Feb 13 22:38
Game of the day is Chicago 1.85 v 2.16 Spurs, just hearing from all reports, Spurs were flat  yesterday without 2 key players, think CHicago at home might have more to play for. I will be following Clippers V 76ers
By:
West Coast Eagles
When: 11 Feb 13 22:38
76ers 2.80 v 1.55 Clippers
By:
Beaniash
When: 11 Feb 13 22:40
D WILL HAS BEEN SHUT DOWN TILL AFTER ALL STAR. CAN ANYONE TELL ME WHY CHICAGO WENT FROM 2.3 TO 1.85 HAS TONY PARKER BEEN SHOT. DONT GET ME WRONG I THINK PRICE SHOULD BE MORE EVEN BUT THE SLIDE SUGGESTS SOMEONE IS NOT PLAYING OR ROSE IS BACK OR NOAH SOMETHING IS UP.
By:
map
When: 11 Feb 13 22:42
west coast what do you mean flat?
By:
West Coast Eagles
When: 11 Feb 13 22:44
their team lacked spark in the loss against Brooklyn last night
By:
werthecardinals
When: 11 Feb 13 22:47
They grubbed Brooklyn last night!
By:
werthecardinals
When: 11 Feb 13 22:47
Sorry gubbed!
By:
map
When: 11 Feb 13 22:52
they were down 6/7 and won by almost 20 wce ?
By:
map
When: 11 Feb 13 22:52
i thought they played well?!
By:
smb360
When: 11 Feb 13 22:56
How much of a factor is fatigue in the NBA, really? They're all athletes that are accustomed to playing for successive days due to the number of matches and the scheduling, and each player only plays a portion of each match. Add to that all the breaks that occur during quarters, between quarters and halves, and a significant amount of time spent pretty much standing around whilst the ball is in play, on both offence and defence, I really don't think that accumulated fatigue (especially from an extra '15' mins) can be very much of a factor.

I am no expert and I don't really know very much about basketball at all but I honestly don't see how tiredness could be much of a factor in this sport.
By:
map
When: 11 Feb 13 22:57
hmm i dunno its tough to say..always see odd results but i hink the spurs will play well
By:
smb360
When: 11 Feb 13 22:58
My post above was more written in response to the suggestion that fatigue could be a leveller in the match between Boston and Charlotte, when there is a clear gulf between the two teams' abilities and form.
By:
Beaniash
When: 11 Feb 13 23:00
MAYBE NOT TONIGHT BUT THERE HAVE BEEN OCCASSIONS WHERE TEAMS ON BACK TO BACKS JUST GAVE UP AFTER 1ST QUARTER. SPURS PLAYING 3RD GAME IN 4 CHICAGO WON AT UTAH WHICH WASNT EASY. ALL SEEMS TO POINT TO A CLOSE GAME. IM LEANING CHICAGO HERE
By:
smb360
When: 11 Feb 13 23:01
Wait it was the other thread where the Boston/Charlotte discussion was going on Laugh
By:
map
When: 11 Feb 13 23:02
what thread
By:
smb360
When: 11 Feb 13 23:03
Look at the forum
By:
map
When: 11 Feb 13 23:03
and im not sure feels like a trap i mean bobcats suck.i want to take -4.5
By:
map
When: 11 Feb 13 23:03
but il wait till it goes live see if i can get better
By:
smb360
When: 11 Feb 13 23:08
Celtics just jumped up 5 ticks
By:
map
When: 11 Feb 13 23:14
game started ive just put it on
By:
Beaniash
When: 11 Feb 13 23:14
CELTICS WILL LOSE YOU MONEY TONIGHT
By:
map
When: 11 Feb 13 23:16
reasons?
By:
smb360
When: 11 Feb 13 23:16
Lol, Celtics 10 Mullens 10
By:
smb360
When: 11 Feb 13 23:16
Celtics should just get there toughest guy to smack Mullens in the face and win 100-0 Grin
By:
map
When: 11 Feb 13 23:16
heh
By:
smb360
When: 11 Feb 13 23:16
*their
By:
smb360
When: 11 Feb 13 23:17
He's scored all of Bobcats' points
By:
smb360
When: 11 Feb 13 23:17
Or had at 10-10, anyway
By:
Beaniash
When: 11 Feb 13 23:23
BOOOOM NO PARKER AND GOT CHICAGO AT 1.9
By:
smb360
When: 11 Feb 13 23:24

Feb 11, 2013 -- 6:14PM, Beaniash wrote:


CELTICS WILL LOSE YOU MONEY TONIGHT


Beaniash, that is quite a forthright opinion to completely write off a significant favourite here. The price does look suspiciously slightly big, but why are you so sure?

By:
Beaniash
When: 11 Feb 13 23:25
IM NOT IT WAS JUST A THROW AWAY COMMENT BASED ON THEM PLAYING 3OTS LAST NIGHT
By:
smb360
When: 11 Feb 13 23:26
Alright. It's just that 'will lose you money' makes it seem like you think it is a certainty; perhaps the caps doesn't help Grin
By:
strawhat21
When: 11 Feb 13 23:27
price on boston is scary guys... why so high against a team like charlotte? its true they had 3 OTs last night, but still....
By:
Beaniash
When: 11 Feb 13 23:28
I JUST CANT TRUST MY MONEY ON A TEAM WHO IS KNOWN TO LOSE EASILY ON THE ROAD TO SHOWER TEAMS
By:
strawhat21
When: 11 Feb 13 23:29
still.. those guys are on a 7 game winning streak, and they played some good teams... they also improved a lot after rondo's injury, ironicly...
By:
strawhat21
When: 11 Feb 13 23:29
i find 1.64 too good, but im really afraid to put my money on them.. the price is too big, too suspicious
By:
strawhat21
When: 11 Feb 13 23:30
and we are talking about bobcats here.. these guys are awful.. kemba walker deserves a better team
Page 1 of 5  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com