By:
A fkn horrible thread IMO
I think I'll be sticking to the old and loved thread. |
By:
Abbott needs to resolve the differences among senior colleagues in his ranks. It is a viper pit at the top of the shadow ministerial tree. Joe Hockey and Andrew Robb loathe each other. Julie Bishop and Ian Macfarlane don't feel all that differently about one another. Turnbull continues to be viewed with caution by colleagues who can't believe he would be happy to serve under Abbott as prime minister.
NO HOPE. ( GONESKI) Turnbull next in line to FAIL. |
By:
spot on AFL - they are a basket case, Abbott is somehow keeping them together BUT it's only a matter of time
|
By:
A basket case?
Coming from the GOVERNMENT supporters? FFS What you talking about wombleoz? .....Somehow keeping them together huh? Here we go again. Bring it on - keep screaming the mantra little Labor boys................"ABBOTTS NOT ELECTABLE". I love it. The more you deny. The more you mock and scorn the OPPOSITION. Thats right, the OPPOSITION. The more you deny your very own side to reconfigure the rabble that has led to a first term government being brought to its knees. I mean, coming from the GOVERNMENT that stabbed its first term Prime Minister............................. Coming from the government that has failed in every policy area it has ventured................. Coming from the government that is weak, leaderless, agendaless and directionless....EVEN according to Labor people Wake up boys. Head your sand stuff. The Coalition have concerns....every political party does. Write them off at your peril. Exciting times and unprecendented politcal opportunities arising for the Coalition - even Labor people acknowledge this. |
By:
Notice how the Liberals only go up in the polls when Abbott is out of the news Jez? It's not a coincidence
As to your rave against Labor, pathetic |
By:
i ask,
Can you give me 1 policy just 1, that labor has implemented and working well come in on or around budget?? i am goping out for a few hours so you've time to ponder. But I feel you'll not be able to give me 1 single credible policy. whats that you say? BER school computers border policy hospitals NBN grocery watch fuel watch mining tax alcopop tax yep all winners??? |
By:
The BER outcome: Time to correct the record
by Bernard Keane Here, in a nutshell, is the result of months of expensive work by the Orgill review team examining the government’s Building the Education Revolution component of its stimulus packages: * It will support, all up, about 120,000 jobs directly and indirectly, “filling a gap left in demand from the private sector and playing an important role in supporting apprentices and skill retention in the building and construction industry”. * The program’s impact was “most pronounced” in its first year, when it was needed most. * The new infrastructure is, in the review team’s opinion, “sorely needed, particularly in government schools”. * The review received complaints from 294 schools across the entire program — 3% of the 10,000-odd school projects. * The review team closely examined 57 projects, nearly all of which were drawn from “the most egregious complaints received by the Taskforce or were selected from our reading of media reports”. Seventeen of those 57 projects were found to fail the value-for-money criteria established by the review team. * Extrapolating that 17/57 figure across all complaints (even though the selected projects were “the most egregious”) suggests the rate of valid complaints about value for money is 0.9% of all projects. * The review has lowered its estimate of how much more the NSW government paid in order to deliver its projects quickly, from 5-6% to “at the bottom of that range, around 5 per cent”. * The total complaint rate even for NSW government school projects, which attracted more than half of all complaints, was 7%. In short, the report is a comprehensive demolition of the campaign that has been run against the program by the opposition — which having missed out with two independent reports now wants a third — and The Australian. That campaign has consisted of claims that the BER was providing poor value for money, that it was useless because it wouldn’t provide any stimulus until after the economy recovered, that the infrastructure was entirely unnecessary, that it was all a “debacle”. In fact, the BER has been a gold standard stimulus program, delivering tens of thousands of jobs, when they were needed, building needed infrastructure, across a vast number of locations, with an almost derisory complaint rate even in NSW, where the government rushed the program as quickly as possible. And what of The Australian and journalists like Matthew Franklin, who has sat in the press gallery bureau and waged a campaign against the program? Or the ABC journalists happy to follow the News Limited line and parrot that the program was a “debacle” on par with the insulation program? Perhaps those journalists should ask the tens of thousands of men and women in the construction industry who still have jobs despite the collapse in private construction since the GFC, who are still in work despite the commercial construction sector grinding to a halt, despite new housing construction going into a precipitate decline this year. Ask the apprentices still learning on the job. Ask their families, their partners and kids. Ask the retailers where they shop. Ask their banks. Check with them if they think it was a “debacle”. That’s not likely to happen either. The media doesn’t like the construction industry, despite it being one of our biggest employers. Maybe it’s journalistic snobbery about manual labour. Or maybe it’s because the only yarn from the construction industry that the media is interested in is about union thuggery. Particularly at The Australian, which led the charge in favour of the Howard government’s assault on the CFMEU — an assault that led to a systematic abrogation of basic civil rights, in the form of the ABCC, and a big rise in workplace deaths. Is it any wonder the Coalition and the media despise a program that has been critical in keeping the industry going since the GFC? From the AUSTRALIAN But by September last year, when it was apparent Australia would avoid recession, the government should have recalibrated the BER, the largest component of its $42bn stimulus. By then, Julia Gillard, as education minister, should have ensured that the spending added greater educational value beyond canteens and halls. Her failure to do so suggests the government was motivated, at least in part, by political considerations. Notice how this fishwrap with ink on it neglects to mention the Libraries and Science and Language Centres through fear of them being associated with educational value. I think the kids of today will get far more Educational Value from the following facilities than giving them copies of 'Lazarus Rising' as a true reflection of history. The following Data is from NSW ….let alone the other states. Primary Schools for the 21st Century (P21) Primary Schools for the 21st Century is a $2.98 billion investment to build or upgrade large-scale infrastructure such as libraries, halls and classrooms and other buildings in every public primary school in NSW. All eligible schools, including special schools and K-12 schools, will receive a funding boost of between $250,000 and $3 million, depending on the number of students enrolled. The program will deliver long-term infrastructure solutions so that students, teachers and the wider community have access to high quality resources to support learning and improve the quality and diversity of learning environments. Number of projects: 2,363 Construction started: 2,355 Construction finished: 1,802 Projects Completed:76% Science & Language Centres (SLC) Science and Language Centres for 21st Century Secondary Schools (SLC) will deliver newly constructed and refurbished science learning centres and language learning centres to eligible secondary schools across NSW. On June 30 2009, the Australian Government announced $810 million of funding for the SLC program, including $151 million of funding for 118 NSW public schools. The SLC program complements the NSW Government’s Building Better Schools program, a $145 million program to upgrade 800 science laboratories by 2011. Number of projects: 118 Construction started: 118 Construction finished: 118 Projects Completed:100% National School Pride (NSP) National School Pride will provide funding of up to $200,000 for every eligible primary, secondary and central school in NSW to refurbish and renew existing infrastructure and undertake minor building works. More than $287 million will be invested in 2,179 public schools across NSW. The very tight timeframes for National School Pride, as set out in the Australian Government’s Building the Education Revolution Guidelines, are designed to deliver immediate support for local employment. Number of projects: 2,179 Projects started: 2,179 Projects completed: 2,179 Projects Completed: 100% (Updated 10 December, 2010) |
By:
BER - see AFL's excellent post, anyone that expects a program of that size to be delivered 100% perfectly is expecting too much - they did very well to have as few problems as they did rolling out as fast as they have and saving 120,000 jobs
school computers - work in progress border policy - struggling BIG time, sooner they change direction and kill this non-issue off the better hospitals - major reforms on their way, massive increases in spending already\ NBN - rolling out as I type this, badly needed infrastructure that's been ignored way too long, will pay for itself many times over in the years to come grocery watch - dropped the ball under pressure from Coles and Woolworths fuel watch - blocked in the Senate, not much they could do about that mining tax - on it's way, the miners even agree they aren't paying enough, a model will be worked out alcopop tax - took the wrong approach on this one there u go GC Investor |
By:
wombleoz.
My rave against Labor? I've called your arguments pathetic, wombleoz, because they ARE. You really struggle to make sense a lot of the time - I mean in the real world - in reality - that is. This is not an attack against your extreme socalism wombleoz, I'll leave that to another day. But, my little mate, you cannot re-write history - this is an attack (and I'm joined by many on the Labor side in this) on the Rudd-Gillard Government. I'll tell you what will be a pathetic blob in history. The Rudd-Gillard Labor years. You can scream your utter nonsense until your blue in the face. I know you always have a response - but I mean, a true, accurate and factual response - never the case, just the desperate NSW Labor style propaganda - you know, "BUSINESS AS USUAL HERE"...."NOTHING TO LOOK AT"..... You wrote that the Opposition are a basket case. Think its fair to say, thats nonsense. If you used your brain and look around and viewed various media on politics over the summer so far, you will have seem the negative and procarious commentary on Rudd-and to-date Gillard Labor. Use your brain mate. You haven't heard of the small-target strategy? Your saying Labor haven't used it. You saying that there have never been leaders of Labor who have changed tact or style to win elections. This is politics wombleoz. Opinion polls come and go. Tony Abbott as he has demonstrated, is in this for the long haul. He is a stayer. Write him off at your peril. I think those with brains, and the hard heads within the ALP, considering this governments weak position currently - acknowledge Abbott as a legimitate and formidable opponent. I mean, in all seriousness, this Labor government lost its majority and butchered its first term PM. Look at your above post about policy, wombleoz. We hear "blocked in senate" "took wrong approach" "work in progress" "struggling big time". You for real with this desperation? The Labor government elected in 2007 has been a monumental disaster - started with much fanfare - but crashed and burned spectacularly. Wake up wombleoz. Wake up to reality pal. Don't know what realm your in. But lets at the very least, without objectivity, stick to the facts. Ta. |
By:
GoldCoastInvestor.
As you rightly point out. The public see's it, exactly the way you do. This government was all talk, no action. Rudd gave us something fresh, but no risky, that we could believe in. But where did he end up? Labor butchered him. Why? When wombleoz and AFL say everything is SO FKN GOOD! It's comical. Wombleoz and AFL, hate to hear it. They are passionate buggers - but we have to get use to seperate ALP facts from fiction. It's like Santa to these young tackers -they'd like to believe - but the brutal truth is he doesn't exist. The Coalition have the opportunity to get themselves into a strong position over the coming 12 months. Wombleoz talks about the polls and Abbotts absense - polling I saw recently showed the majority of the public acknowledged the Opposition's and Abbotts leadership on the Christmas Island disaster than the Governments and Gillard's Thats just one example. But to knock Abbott for using a political strategy or having a plan for election is just fanciful and really clueless, to be honest. Lets get real - the GOVERNMENT is Labor and the OPPOSITION is the Coalition. The Coalition has ideal time to reconsider and reconfigure its strategies - plenty ahead in 2011 - I'm sure Australian's will like what they see in 2011 from the Coalition. I think the Government is in big trouble. Gillard has not settled, the government has no political capital and has looked weak from week to week. There is still hope - but lets not mince words - there are BIG challenges ahead for the government and I doubt very much they are ready for it. The amusing part between now and the next election is listening to the hysterical squeals of denial from the likes of wombleoz and AFL. It's the likes of you within the Labor Party, with the chronic denial and lack of realisation of what occured in August that will lead to a complete explosion of the ALP politically - its already started - and is far from finishing. |
By:
You keep rabbitting on about the BER AFL.
I'm not reading those posts anymore mate. I doubt anyone, except you and wombleoz, wanting something positive to browse over, are reading it. It's always wise important to remember: Perception is everything in politics. I've mentioned AFL and wombleoz, very broadly (as internet posters)at my workplace............you blokes are the LAST people needed within ALP offices. And the last people I'd want if I were in political office. Chronic denial and foolish head in sand stuff. Keep it real boys. I mean in 2007, I knew very early that the Coalition would lose power. I still campaigned during the election, but when I discussed politics I made it very clear - the Coalition would not win and I was aware of why, politically. Lots of discussion at Lib meetings from then on. The whys, the hows, the what ifs, the remedies. And move on. |
By:
Another white hot beauty from the Labour bunker: Re- branding the thread title Wombleffs... got to hand it to you
Surprised it didn't include the words "moving forward" Absolute stunner...the ultimate spin doctor... Im sticking to the old thread ...just because it has sailed past 1500 posts and could post all time record posts and because of the blatant re-branding : Fk me ...that is funny |
By:
wombleoz is one of the faithful, thats for sure.
I think of him, presently as akin to the captain of the ill-fated Titanic...............he stood at the bridge, shoulders back and proud. He went down with the ship. As will wombleoz. |
By:
PS - I'm with you AP, I'm sticking with the original thread.
|
By:
won't be much of a debate if we're posting on different threads, move with the times boys - it's 2011, it's going to be a HUGE year in politics and deserves it's own thread - it's own thread with a generic title
if you read my response to the GCinvestors you will notice I bagged Labor on a few points - they have done stuff wrong, no denying it and the reason I won't give them my first preference, the party has lost it's way trying to be everything to everybody - they need to come back to the centre / centre left where they should be however, it's not all as bad as Jez and others would have you believe - the economy is the envy of most countries, we've avoided recession despite the GFC and unemployment still has a 5 in front of it when most have 2 or more times that. we're doing pretty bloody well just quietly. Labor's biggest mistake is that they set expectations too high, especially around the delivery of infrastructure and then they got whacked with the GFC to top it off. 2011 is the year they have to deliver and I think, with the help of the Greens and Independents they will - it's in all their interests to have a government that achieves things and the blocking, negative, do nothing Liberals won't be in the way anymore. I notice all you Liberal fans failed to address Paid Parental Leave, something govenments have failed to deliver on for generations that it took a Labor government to deliver - a real result for the Australian people |
By:
Did my usual float around the dial on the radio when I woke up this morning prior to getting ready to go back to work
Heard the sad news that a boat with 80 African refugees has sunk with only a few survivors - where? Off the coast of Yemen - awful stuff wherever it happens but highlights the fact that this is a global issue that needs a global response not just an Australian one |
By:
18 October 2001
A small, unnamed 19.5 X 4 metre wooden fishing boat that would later be dubbed SIEVX (Suspected Illegal Entry Vessel X) departs Bandar Lampung with approximately 421 passengers. This dilapidated, unseaworthy boat would have been overcrowded with 150 aboard, let alone 400. (LATER, SURVIVORS WOULD REPORT THAT MANY WERE FORCED ABOARD AT GUNPOINT BY INDONESIAN POLICE WHO SUPERVISED THE LOADING.) Some hours into the voyage the boat stops near an island in the Sunda Strait and 23 Mandaean passengers disembark into another boat, the Rukun Agung, due to fears that the horrendously overcrowded vessel will sink. The Rukun Agung breaks down and the captain Mr Udin contacts his employer, Mr Wedi for assistance. The Mandaeans are landed at Lempasing beach and later interviewed by Indonesian police before making their way back to Cisarua. 19 October 2001 3pm: The boat goes down in INTERNATIONAL WATERS, INSIDE THE AUSTRALIAN AERIAL BORDER PROTECTION SURVEILLANCE ZONE. APPROXIMATELY 146 CHILDREN, 142 WOMEN AND 65 MEN PERISH. …........................................................................................................................................................ The Prime Minister John Howard repeatedly tells the Australian people that it went down in INDONESSIAN TERRITORIAL WATERS and so not our problem. Despite having access to a DEFAT cable that states, THE SIEV referring to SIEVX IS BELIEVED TO HAVE FOUNDERED IN ROUGH SEAS TO THE SOUTH OF SUNDA ST WITHIN THE INDONESIAN MARITIME SEARCH AND RESCUE AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY. …......................................................................................................................................................... THAT IS NOT INDONESIAN TERRITORIAL WATERS. INDONESIAN TERRITORIAL WATERS ARE CLOSE TO THE BORDERS OF INDONESIA. THE INDONESIAN MARITIME SEARCH AND RESCUE AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY EXTENDS DEEP INTO THE TIMOR SEA AND ABUTS AUSTRALIA. IT COVERS WHAT WOULD, IN LAYMAN'S TERMS, BE CALLED INTERNATIONAL WATERS. The cable is a significant piece of information because it goes to whether AUSTRALIAN SEARCH AND RESCUE CAPABILITY COULD HAVE INTRUDED INTO THE AREA CONCERNED TO RESCUE PEOPLE WHO WERE ON THAT ILL-FATED SHIP. Survivers reported planes overhead that appeard to just fly past. They also reported 2 vessels that came within eyeshot but did nothing. They were eventually rescued by 2 nearby Indonessian fishing boats?? This whole episode is the biggest cover-up in our history. Imo. We partly financed and trained the Indonessians in implimenting a Boat People deterance system ( hence these poor people were under Indonessian Police Guard in the lead up to their ill fated journey.) This deterance was beefed up as a result of the Children Overboard incident that embarresed the Howard Govt. The whole aerea between Indonessia and Australia was monitored and many many boats were detected and turned around, but this one somehow slipped through and our Govt denied knowledge of it's existence. YEAHHH RIGHT. IMO. |
By:
Wombleoz - what this nation needs is an ounce of leadership from this woman. What we've seen so far has been limp, weak and confused governing from Gillard Labor. From responding to Wikileaks to responding to the Christmas Island tragedy - its pathetic. Truly. Australia needs real leadership on all of these issues - including boat people. We've heard all the talk, we've seen all the reviews - NOW, more than ever, we need ACTION! Never before have I seen a government that has so quickly, so rapidly and in such fanfare - become so stale, out of touch and just, well, irrelevent. Change is coming. Not just in Victoria, not just in NSW. The nation gave Labor a firm warning in August 2010, and what we've seen since, I reakon cements the views of most Australian's - Labor's a mess - they're not just up to it. I love listening to the farcical squealing and comments this brings from wombleoz and AFL - its very noble that they are such "true believers". Change is coming. |
By:
Thought I'd introduce someone who is very close to wombleoz's heart.
A fellow watermelon. A proud commo. The incoming NSW Senator for The Greens. Her name, Lee Rhiannon. I've got a special feeling, we'll be hearing plenty of Lee on the national stage in the latter half of this year. I think Lee will provide a real boost to the Labor-Green Gillard Government......... |
By:
P.S - Move on AFL. Suppose you also believe Elvis is flipping burgers somewhere in Texas as well, huh?
Course you do. You love your conspiracies. How about encouraging your beloved leader, comrade Gillard to start showing some real leadership on your favoured topic, boat people. Bottom line. Stop the boats. Stop the deaths. I think the suggestions you make are not only fanciful (i.e - open the gates and let them come, one and all) but also extremely inhumane, in that you by default encourage these desperate people to make a deadly journey, in an effort, to get to our shores. Shame Shame Shame. |
By:
Jez is fair dinkum obsessed with Lee Rhiannon - she'll be one of plenty of Greens in parliament Jez - I for one can hardly wait. Interesting that Bob Brown came out in support of local retailers today, those bloody greens - anti jobs, anti business
Nice post again AFL - like i have said before Jez is only interested in talking about the past if it supports his argument Big year 2011 - expect to see plenty achieved and plenty of leadership from Julia - e.g. like on paid parental leave which Jez and the others refuse to comment on [;)] |
By:
I'm not obsessed. I'm conducting an "awareness" campaign.
Not that I need to. Lee has it all covered. You just wait. Bob will struggle to contain her. Lee Rhiannon represents the core of The Greens. The hidden agenda of The Greens will thankfully see the light of day with Lee around As for AFL. He can rabbit on as much as he likes with his Crikey pastings, LOL. Anything to deflect from the issue itself, anything to deflect from the current governments inability to show an ounce of leadership on this issue. I mean listen to this piece of concrete evidence: "Survivers reported planes overhead that appeard to just fly past." I mean this jelly-like argument about John Howard manipulating what he told the public is just rot. I mean, you suggest that Indonesia Waters should really be International waters, therefore Howard lied to the Australia people - I mean, WTF? Why don't you spin a little harder, AFL? [smiley:crazy] The suggestions AFL make are the dreams of left wing fanatics - its speculative nonsense. I'm surprised, AFL, trying to make political milage out of a tragedy - you should really be ashamed of yourself AFL. I mean desperate clutching at straws. Your argument is as weak as water. I wonder what conspiracies I could draw on from the Gillard Government's involvement in the recent Christmas Island tragedy. Maybe they knew the boat was destined for disaster? Maybe the government set out to murder those people? Why haven't the dead been identified yet, what are they up to? What utter garbage. Shame on you. I mean the crux of AFL's argument is not even his own. It's copied and pasted from some left wingers book, with a twisted highly speculative version of events - its intent is to muddy the waters and casting an evil taint onto the Howard Government. The book certainly has rattled AFL's little mind. |
By:
As for 2011 in Australian politics. Bring it on. Abbott V Gillard. |
By:
Try as you will wombleoz.
You and I both know the hidden agenda of The Greens. Its not about the environment, the planet, the animals, the welfare of the Australian people or for that matter, Gerry Harvey and Australian retailers. This is an extreme party, with an extreme agenda. [>o] I'd encourage anyone considering voting Green. Think carefully - and don't risk it. |
By:
Howard Govt / Jez Melb Punter Doctrine 101
DENY EVERYTHING ADMIT NOTHING MAKE COUNTER-ACCUSATIONS |
By:
You will see the future of the Greens in 2011 Jez and it's not Lee Rhiannon - there is some real talent coming through that will see the party boost it's numbers, call it extreme all you want most people will see that they are a legitimate 3rd force in Australian politics
|
By:
Sure wombleoz. Victorian election is just a taste. The Greens are trying to play with the big boys now - GOODLUCK! [;)] If you think Lee won't come unstuck in some way with your very vocal thoughts - your head is in the sand - the only newcomer Australian's will see from the Greens next year will be........... Again........GOODLUCK! |
By:
EVERY PICTURE TELLS A STORY
|
By:
ffs AFL.
I saw a similar cartoon with Gillard in it a few weeks ago. |
By:
Bill Shorten and Labor stare down the billionaires on extending the gst to under $1k - good result for now BUT Bob Brown and the Greens were right, longer term something has to be done about the revenue leakage, in the UK VAT applies to anything over 18 pounds
|
By:
Womble : These retailers have been ripping off consumers for years ...ffs
|
By:
Retailers just have to become more efficient.
The business world is tough, if they can't evolve and keep up, fk em... |
By:
I'd also like to throw my support on this thread behind the 'Bob Brown and the Greens are a fkn liability to this nation' cause...
|
By:
Your not alone The Big O.
The Greens are not as wombleoz suggest a third force in Australian politics. They're an extreme group, with a populist front. Green on the outside, Red on the inside. They're a minority, trying to dictate to the majority. And Gillard Labor, seem to be all for it. Bring on an Abbott Coalition Government. The more of Gillard Labor that I see, the more confident I am of the Coalitions chances at the next election. Tony Abbott and the team are in a prime position. The scrutiny will continue in 2011 in addition to a strong policy drive. Readying the Coalition for the potential (or not) of a resurgent government late next year or early 2012. I can't wait to see how this Carbon Tax unfolds. And the Gillard Labor year of Decision and Delivery. Remember the expectations of Kevin07? The circus continues! And with the antics of the hung parliament, namely Oakeshott, Windsor and namely The Greens - i'll expect the message "Labor are in government, but the Greens are in power" will resonate very well with the electorate towards the end of this year. |
By:
PS - On the issue of dams and Tony Abbott's comments today in relation to this - he has made the first move as a leader and is totally right - something real must be done to protect states (like Queensland), people and the economy from flooding. The answer is most likely far more complex than a few dams - but at least he made a positive move. At least he had a plan to start with. Gillard on the other hand has nothing constructive to put forward. She did as she always does - sneers at everyone else, talks down to the population, criticises other people but has nothing to put up herself. Gillard will go down in history as the PM with no plans at all and nothing to show for her time as PM except rorts and failures.
|
By:
Abbott and Joyce ....LOL what a Comedy Act. A Dam to ease the floods? IDIOTS.
One of Australia's leading researchers says building more dams will not solve the nation's water woes. Opposition Leader Tony Abbott announced today a plan to build more dams as a way of managing water in the country. But Jamie Pittock, a researcher at the Australian National University, says Mr Abbott's idea is not smart. "You can either build a dam to store water for use, but if the dam is full of stored water it cannot catch a flood," he said. "If you want to build a dam to catch a flood, you have to keep that dam empty and then that doesn't store water. You can't have it both ways." Mr Pittock also argues that Australia has limited options for dams and all the suitable sites have already been used. "Many of the dams we have built are actually proven to be mistakes - they're too shallow, they evaporate too much water and in fact we are starting to pull down some dams just this past year," he said. "The Victorian Government has been decommissioning Lake Mokoan, a water storage near Benalla because it loses too much water." But Mr Abbott says that for too long Australia has turned its back on new dams. "I think it's time for a bit of national leadership, a bit of vision when it comes to water policy. And I think it's time that as a nation we put new dams back on our agenda," Mr Abbott said. He argues that Australia has built no major new dams in the past two decades, largely because of unjustified prejudice. "Now I know there are problems with many dam sites, but I fail to see that there are no dam sites anywhere in Australia where the economic and social benefits outweigh any environmental costs," he said. Water policy At a news conference today, Mr Abbott announced that a special shadow cabinet taskforce would look at where new dams might be built and how they could fit into national water policy. "Dams can be flood mitigation devices as well as water storages," he said. "They can be a potential source of zero-emissions power as well as water storages. They can be a source of environmental flows in dry times as well as just water storages." Mr Abbott insists there are lessons to be learned from Queensland's flood disaster. After all, he says, at the height of its flow, enough water to fill Sydney Harbour twice over passed through Rockhampton every day. But the Prime Minister disagrees with his solution. "We should not conclude that that would have been fixed by the building of a limited number of dams. That's simply not the case," Julia Gillard said. "So we do have to deal with the flooding that is there at the moment. We do have to work with communities that are really hurting at this time. "There will be plenty of time down the track for debating these kinds of policy issues." The Wilderness Society has also criticised the Opposition's proposal. "You can have massive decline in fish species, you often stop water flowing into wetlands downstream where you have huge bird breeding events, and the natural flows you're stopping flowing downstream provide nutrients and fresh water for fisheries," Glenn Walker from the Wilderness Society said. Mr Walker says Mr Abbott has not produced any evidence that building more dams would help during floods. "I've given the example of the Burnett River catchment which flows into Bundaberg. Having a lot of dams hasn't actually prevented the flooding of that area," he said. "And this claim that you're putting aside water for dry times is just ludicrous. It shows Tony Abbott and Barnaby Joyce know very little about river ecology." .............................................................................................................. And this bloke(Abbott) wants to run the country. |
By:
Maybe he wants a dam with a plug in it......like a bathtub.
|
By:
You ever write any of your own posts AFL
I mean, an ANU "researcher" and the Wilderness Society are the leading critics here. I think it would pay for you to actually read what Tony Abbott had to say. His suggestion is not the whole solution but an idea being put forward. Which is much more than we can say for Julia Gillard. All she can do is hiss and scoff. Your reaction shows how desperate Labor and its limited number of followers, truly are! Love it. |
By:
|