<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Last One In</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/aintree2011/go/thread/view/121613/28918507/last-one-in</link><description>138,139 seems cut off normally and was 69th in weights last year, not sure previous years. Any thoughts as seems less garbage in the field.I'm hoping the 139's get in though McCain thinks its unlikely Wymott gets in. Also whats the rule when they hav</description><item><title>And it would be a tragedy if State of Play doesn't get in.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/aintree2011/go/thread/view/121613/28918507/last-one-in?post_id=517136105#517136105</link><description>And it would be a tragedy if State of Play doesn't get in.</description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 04:00:10 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>My guess is Postmaster.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/aintree2011/go/thread/view/121613/28918507/last-one-in?post_id=517136073#517136073</link><description>My guess is Postmaster.</description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:57:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>It's hard to make comparisons because there are usually 30 odd more entries than there are this year and 8(ish) horses haven't qualified yet. If the same proportion drop out as last year the cut off would be somewhere round horse 56 (10 st 3).</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/aintree2011/go/thread/view/121613/28918507/last-one-in?post_id=516346895#516346895</link><description>It's hard to make comparisons because there are usually 30 odd more entries than there are this year and 8(ish) horses haven't qualified yet. If the same proportion drop out as last year the cut off would be somewhere round horse 56 (10 st 3).</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:18:56 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>guru, The average over last 20 odd years is 77th on the list. Remember a few may be chucked out if they don't meet the new criteria.If they have to pick one, i.e a few tied at 139, they'll go with the highest rated at the time.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/aintree2011/go/thread/view/121613/28918507/last-one-in?post_id=516344897#516344897</link><description>guru, The average over last 20 odd years is 77th on the list. Remember a few may be chucked out if they don't meet the new criteria.If they have to pick one, i.e a few tied at 139, they'll go with the highest rated at the time.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:32:03 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>138,139 seems cut off normally and was 69th in weights last year, not sure previous years. Any thoughts as seems less garbage in the field.I'm hoping the 139's get in though McCain thinks its unlikely Wymott gets in. Also whats the rule when they hav</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/aintree2011/go/thread/view/121613/28918507/last-one-in?post_id=516341783#516341783</link><description>138,139 seems cut off normally and was 69th in weights last year, not sure previous years. Any thoughts as seems less garbage in the field.I'm hoping the 139's get in though McCain thinks its unlikely Wymott gets in. Also whats the rule when they hav</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:11:20 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
