He only dropped one set I think, to Gulbis...before winning in 5 vs fed.
So far he's lost to Lopez in Queens, never came close to losing to Petch or Haase but has dropped 2 sets to virtual nobodies. Personally haven't noticed a huge difference in the way he's playing...everything looks pretty similar to me...
Similar to when he lost against Lopez at queens, I couldn't really fathom how he'd lost that game...he played a fair bit better and apart from one easy missed smash in the first set TB, I'm struggling to find reasons as to why he's dropping sets so easily.
FWIW, 1.1 vs PHM is crazy short...surely a lay to back.
Rafa of 2008 was still running for everything. Now he thinks before going for a low percentage winner. Rafa is slower off of the mark and he knows that any extreme moves may result in injury. He's like bad back Agassi only not quite that restricted....yet. Can still do everything except make improbable winners.
Rafa of 2008 was still running for everything. Now he thinks before going for a low percentage winner. Rafa is slower off of the mark and he knows that any extreme moves may result in injury. He's like bad back Agassi only not quite that res
Big difference in his mind not just body imo, easier being number 2 than number 1. What made Pete and Roger so great was how comfortable they were with being on that pedlar-stool at the top of the game.
Big difference in his mind not just body imo, easier being number 2 than number 1. What made Pete and Roger so great was how comfortable they were with being on that pedlar-stool at the top of the game.
Players play fearless against him at the moment, going for winners. More importantly he does hit the ball flatter than a year ago, less topspin. Some say because his earlier play caused him to lose the FO to Soderling. This results, however, in him being more vulnerable now to other players aside from Soderling.
Players play fearless against him at the moment, going for winners. More importantly he does hit the ball flatter than a year ago, less topspin. Some say because his earlier play caused him to lose the FO to Soderling. This results, however, in him b
I really don`t think there is any need to put too much emphasise on the Lopez defeat, best of 3 on grass at Queens often the difference is one or 2 points especially if the lower ranked player is playing a great match. The difference between 2008 and 2010 I think is simply no more than that 2 of Nadal`s 3 opponents so far have played the match of their lives, at least to this point in their careers. It happens, unusual for 2 in row though in the same tournament.
Remember Cowan v Sampras? It happens, but who won the match is what counts.
I really don`t think there is any need to put too much emphasise on the Lopez defeat, best of 3 on grass at Queens often the difference is one or 2 points especially if the lower ranked player is playing a great match.The difference between 2008 and
Not suprising if the performance of his opponents is opponents is of a higher level compared to 2008. I don`t think either of his 1st 3 round opponents played as well as Haase and Petzschner.
R128 Andreas Beck (GER) 122 W 6-4, 6-4, 7-6 Stats R64 Ernests Gulbis (LAT) 48 W 5-7, 6-2, 7-6(2),6-3 Stats R32 Nicolas Kiefer (GER) 32 W 7-6(3), 6-2, 6-3 Stats R16 Mikhail Youzhny (RUS) 17 W 6-3, 6-3, 6-1 Stats Q Andy Murray (GBR) 11 W 6-3, 6-2, 6-4 Stats S Rainer Schuettler (GER) 94 W 6-1, 7-6(3), 6-4 Stats W Roger Federer (SUI) 1 W 6-4, 6-4, 6-7(5), 6-7(8), 9-7
Not suprising if the performance of his opponents is opponents is of a higher level compared to 2008. I don`t think either of his 1st 3 round opponents played as well as Haase and Petzschner.R128 Andreas Beck (GER) 122 W 6-4, 6-4, 7-
The courts do appear to be a little quicker this year or perhaps I'm imagining it. I can't imagine they really changed much.
The real difference? Dr Fuentes is on vacation.
The courts do appear to be a little quicker this year or perhaps I'm imagining it. I can't imagine they really changed much. The real difference? Dr Fuentes is on vacation.
"More importantly he does hit the ball flatter than a year ago, less topspin."
He's doing this to shorten the points and spare his body. So he'll net more backhands. Real strength of the Nadal game was consistency and great defence because of his speed. But his biggest strength was and still is his mental strength.
Last match he showed uncharacteristic anger and frustration. For good reason of course. Two guys he should be able to whack take him to five sets and his knee is bothering him. He's not Federer. He doesn't like low ranked players jerking him around, even in a losing effort.
"More importantly he does hit the ball flatter than a year ago, less topspin." He's doing this to shorten the points and spare his body. So he'll net more backhands. Real strength of the Nadal game was consistency and great defence becaus