Nov 18, 2018 -- 9:42AM, toilettennisplayer wrote:
Quecard - a lot of horses would win if they didn't fall .... you can't award them the race cos you feel sorry for them ...
No one fell, interference is different
Nov 18, 2018 -- 9:52AM, toilettennisplayer wrote:
lol - how could any other decsion other than that made could be anything other than rancid? ie correct decision made if that didnt make sense.
That is NOT the rules in this part of the world. The stewards make up what they want on a regular basis. In US racing u know were u stand when a Inquiry is called
Nov 18, 2018 -- 10:03AM, flushgordon1 wrote:
Stewards absolutely correct ,that is all.
No one is disputing what should be the correct result. But, going by the rules of the stewards this is not in the rule book
Nov 18, 2018 -- 11:19AM, toilettennisplayer wrote:
2 completely different matters being discussed. Re the hoovering up by those in the know - ie the stewards - of course its a bit bent and corrupt, but then maybe foolish to leave up unmatched bets after a few minutes when the deliberations are might be expected to be finalized.Re the actual decision, I don't know what drugs some of you are on, re the decsion being against the rules of racing. There was wanton blatant interference after the last hurdle and the victim was placed behind the culprit. The fact that another horse came up on the blind side to be 2nd past the post is of no relevance. He must de facto get promoted to the winner. What is there not to understand ??
Quite true, Inspector Toilet, but you forget the lapse of time to change the iniation time of money on the forum, and through psychological means to change the betting for the scared pundits from odds against to odds on. Easy peasy, Cutter is pleasy
Nov 18, 2018 -- 2:27PM, andyl wrote:
and nothing was hoovered...the 1st 2 flip flopped late on..that is all.
Talking absolute bollox as well. Tell us why the FPTP was odds on for 90% of the time if it was a sure thing to lose the race according to u??