Mar 16, 2018 -- 8:30PM, The Headmaster wrote:
No I don't BB. But I know if the rule was in place they could, would or should remind them how many times not to hit them.Get it?
and then simply refuse to use them in future
it would soon be out of the game imo
owners pay the bills, not jockeys
Mar 16, 2018 -- 8:33PM, the dealer wrote:
i personally think your talking nonsense with regards that and imo hitting the owner isnt the answer
owners (as a population) are not being hit though
they are completely unaffected by this proposal
its only the owners of the rule breakers who are disadvantaged...and its in favour of the owners who have been disadvantaged by being beaten by a horse that has had an unfair advantage
there is no net advantage or disadvantage to the collective owner
Mar 16, 2018 -- 9:11PM, brendrew wrote:
dont think johson will be bothered one jot
correct, and that's the problem
Mar 16, 2018 -- 9:24PM, Shrewd_dude wrote:
Nothing will ever work unless there is some sort of downside to the owners by a jockey transgressing. You could severely penalise the jockey but there would still be pressure from the owners in big races for the jockeys to be one who takes it for the team when need be. It would be the ones who stick by the rules who get jocked off when they stick to the limit when the money is down or it's a big race.
could not agree with you more SD
You need to open an account before you can add content to the forum.
Opening an account only takes a few minutes.