Oct 30, 2017 -- 3:25PM, Catch Me ifyoucan wrote:
Morning all. So I've done a bit of analysis on the E/W v Win Only argument & I would have been approx 55pts worse of in 16/17 if I'd backed all my players 2pts win only instead of 1pt e/w. Agree that if you're backing at 25s/33s only week in week out e/w won't help you long term but if you're backing players @ 3 fig prices regularly the e/w return keeps u in the game & can give a good return.Worth repeating imho.....keep her lit.
One season not a big enough sample size to know for sure imo. One winner at 80-1 or higher and he was better off going win only. Agree that the e/w component keeps you in the game though, back win only and the long dry spells prob mean someone gives up before the big win they need ever comes, but that is more a psychology problem than a maths one.
You need to open an account before you can add content to the forum.
Opening an account only takes a few minutes.