May 16, 2017 -- 4:08PM, bobweenit wrote:
Gonna have a big non cutting bet on KKR myself Gambhir will steer his boys through serenely
WOULD YOU ADAM AND EVE IT $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
May 17, 2017 -- 2:46PM, frog2 wrote:
Rain has really helped KKR. No way they would have got the original total.
I think they would have still got it easily. Chasing off 20 overs, gives you time to settle in. Batting 7 overs, your forced to be aggressive from the get go.
May 17, 2017 -- 2:54PM, frog2 wrote:
128 was more than enough on this pitch with this attack
Don't think it would have been enough. The lowest defended target before this match on this ground was 138 runs from 57 matches. Would have been something very , very special.
May 17, 2017 -- 2:59PM, frog2 wrote:
As I said ECE you are not comparing like with like
You are right in that regard. For instance , I look at the ground in the Big Bash, like the Hobart Hurricanes home ground. Traditionally, it used to be one of the toughest scoring grounds in Australia. Now with the flat wicket, floodlights, and smaller boundaries, you can't compare apples with oranges. I think a bigger indicator is the median values as you focus on the middle scores. I focus on median values in run chases and median values in 1st innings runs as they I think give a more fairer reflection. The mean in this case would be fairly bias. I've watched many IPL games (since season 1) and I honestly don't think there is that much in change in wickets. You also have to factor into account how bad Bangalore have been this season.
You need to open an account before you can add content to the forum.
Opening an account only takes a few minutes.